From 55015a045603dfba3cb9d952a42799e4e95ce1dd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Motiejus=20Jak=C5=A1tys?= <motiejus@jakstys.lt>
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2024 16:47:17 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] decentralization

---
 app/signup/templates/signup/index.html | 19 +++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/app/signup/templates/signup/index.html b/app/signup/templates/signup/index.html
index 624c008..67d1d34 100644
--- a/app/signup/templates/signup/index.html
+++ b/app/signup/templates/signup/index.html
@@ -323,26 +323,25 @@
     </div>
   </article>
 
-  {% comment %}
   <article>
     <input type="checkbox" id="ac-62" checked="checked" />
     <label for="ac-62"><h2>Isn’t Syncthing all about decentralization?</h2></label>
     <div>
 
-        Here is a comment from Syncthing Foundation about 11sync.net:
+      Yes, Syncthing indeed champions decentralization, and we fully embrace
+      it. At 11sync.net, our role is to complement this decentralized system by
+      offering a resilient peer that also does back-ups for you (separately
+      from <a
+      href="https://docs.syncthing.net/users/versioning.html">versioning</a>).
 
-        <blockquote> There is also a feeling that the centralisation of
-            Syncthing services contradicts the project goals of individuals
-            running decentralised syncing; we (as the project/foundation) will
-        likely not recommend your service as best practice.</blockquote>
-
-        <p>We understand and value the position of Syncthing Foundation. Our
-        goal is to offer a resilient peer to those who need it.
+      <p>For those who are adept at handling their own backups or already
+      possess a reliable, always-on peer, 11sync.net might not be necessary.
+      We’re here to provide an additional layer of reliability and convenience
+      for those who need it.
 
       <div></div>
     </div>
   </article>
- {% endcomment %}
 
   <article>
     <input type="checkbox" id="ac-65" checked="checked" />