From a12f3d9461a878985f17f4f23fabef09505ae97d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Motiejus=20Jak=C5=A1tys?= Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2024 00:11:20 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] zig question update --- content/log/2024/zig-reproduced-without-binaries.md | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/content/log/2024/zig-reproduced-without-binaries.md b/content/log/2024/zig-reproduced-without-binaries.md index f13308a..b289b11 100644 --- a/content/log/2024/zig-reproduced-without-binaries.md +++ b/content/log/2024/zig-reproduced-without-binaries.md @@ -133,7 +133,8 @@ the official `zig1.wasm` and the one built here match. I am looking forward to Hilton landing this to Guix, so anyone can audit the build script and reproduce this exercise by themselves with an otherwise -[bootstrappable][7] system. If you don't trust Guix, what do you trust? +[bootstrappable][7] system. If you don't trust Guix, what and whom do you +trust? If anyone can trace origins of `zig1.wasm` by producing an identical version themselves, perhaps it's not too bad to trust it and have it checked in?