Fix deprecation in DirCache caused by Instant based DirCacheEntry
Replace the two int variables smudge_s and smudge_ns by an Instant and use the new method DirCacheEntry.mightBeRacilyClean(Instant). Change-Id: Id70adbb0856a64909617acf65da1bae8e2ae934a Signed-off-by: Michael Keppler <Michael.Keppler@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
86a567f615
commit
6cb21049d7
|
@ -671,8 +671,7 @@ void writeTo(File dir, OutputStream os) throws IOException {
|
|||
|
||||
// Write the individual file entries.
|
||||
|
||||
final int smudge_s;
|
||||
final int smudge_ns;
|
||||
Instant smudge;
|
||||
if (myLock != null) {
|
||||
// For new files we need to smudge the index entry
|
||||
// if they have been modified "now". Ideally we'd
|
||||
|
@ -680,12 +679,10 @@ void writeTo(File dir, OutputStream os) throws IOException {
|
|||
// so we use the current timestamp as a approximation.
|
||||
myLock.createCommitSnapshot();
|
||||
snapshot = myLock.getCommitSnapshot();
|
||||
smudge_s = (int) (snapshot.lastModifiedInstant().getEpochSecond());
|
||||
smudge_ns = snapshot.lastModifiedInstant().getNano();
|
||||
smudge = snapshot.lastModifiedInstant();
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
// Used in unit tests only
|
||||
smudge_ns = 0;
|
||||
smudge_s = 0;
|
||||
smudge = Instant.EPOCH;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Check if tree is non-null here since calling updateSmudgedEntries
|
||||
|
@ -697,8 +694,9 @@ void writeTo(File dir, OutputStream os) throws IOException {
|
|||
|
||||
for (int i = 0; i < entryCnt; i++) {
|
||||
final DirCacheEntry e = sortedEntries[i];
|
||||
if (e.mightBeRacilyClean(smudge_s, smudge_ns))
|
||||
if (e.mightBeRacilyClean(smudge)) {
|
||||
e.smudgeRacilyClean();
|
||||
}
|
||||
e.write(dos);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue