DepthGenerator: fix multi-child boundary handling

Suppose that a repository has the following commit graph:

 B   C
  \ /
   A

and it was cloned with --shallow-exclude=A. DepthGenerator does not mark
C as shallow, causing an invalid repository to be produced on the
client, because A is not sent. (A similar issue occurs when
--shallow-since is used to exclude A but neither B nor C.)

This happens whenever an excluded commit has more than one child that is
to be sent to the client. Fix DepthGenerator to handle this case
correctly.

While we're editing DepthWalk.Commit, fix the documentation of
DepthWalk.Commit#isBoundary.

Change-Id: I7068abf0fe0c864d1b0e56e1616dad1aa8719411
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>
This commit is contained in:
Jonathan Tan 2018-11-08 14:46:10 -08:00
parent 1385f4b3da
commit df21eec1ad
3 changed files with 98 additions and 3 deletions

View File

@ -1279,6 +1279,48 @@ public void testV2FetchShallowSince() throws Exception {
assertTrue(client.hasObject(merge.toObjectId()));
}
@Test
public void testV2FetchShallowSince_excludedParentWithMultipleChildren() throws Exception {
PersonIdent person = new PersonIdent(remote.getRepository());
RevCommit base = remote.commit()
.committer(new PersonIdent(person, 1500000000, 0)).create();
RevCommit child1 = remote.commit().parent(base)
.committer(new PersonIdent(person, 1510000000, 0)).create();
RevCommit child2 = remote.commit().parent(base)
.committer(new PersonIdent(person, 1520000000, 0)).create();
remote.update("branch1", child1);
remote.update("branch2", child2);
ByteArrayInputStream recvStream = uploadPackV2(
"command=fetch\n",
PacketLineIn.DELIM,
"deepen-since 1510000\n",
"want " + child1.toObjectId().getName() + "\n",
"want " + child2.toObjectId().getName() + "\n",
"done\n",
PacketLineIn.END);
PacketLineIn pckIn = new PacketLineIn(recvStream);
assertThat(pckIn.readString(), is("shallow-info"));
// "base" is excluded, so its children are shallow.
assertThat(
Arrays.asList(pckIn.readString(), pckIn.readString()),
hasItems(
"shallow " + child1.toObjectId().getName(),
"shallow " + child2.toObjectId().getName()));
assertThat(pckIn.readString(), theInstance(PacketLineIn.DELIM));
assertThat(pckIn.readString(), is("packfile"));
parsePack(recvStream);
// Only the children are sent.
assertFalse(client.hasObject(base.toObjectId()));
assertTrue(client.hasObject(child1.toObjectId()));
assertTrue(client.hasObject(child2.toObjectId()));
}
@Test
public void testV2FetchShallowSince_noCommitsSelected() throws Exception {
PersonIdent person = new PersonIdent(remote.getRepository());
@ -1405,6 +1447,49 @@ public void testV2FetchDeepenNot_supportAnnotatedTags() throws Exception {
assertTrue(client.hasObject(four.toObjectId()));
}
@Test
public void testV2FetchDeepenNot_excludedParentWithMultipleChildren() throws Exception {
PersonIdent person = new PersonIdent(remote.getRepository());
RevCommit base = remote.commit()
.committer(new PersonIdent(person, 1500000000, 0)).create();
RevCommit child1 = remote.commit().parent(base)
.committer(new PersonIdent(person, 1510000000, 0)).create();
RevCommit child2 = remote.commit().parent(base)
.committer(new PersonIdent(person, 1520000000, 0)).create();
remote.update("base", base);
remote.update("branch1", child1);
remote.update("branch2", child2);
ByteArrayInputStream recvStream = uploadPackV2(
"command=fetch\n",
PacketLineIn.DELIM,
"deepen-not base\n",
"want " + child1.toObjectId().getName() + "\n",
"want " + child2.toObjectId().getName() + "\n",
"done\n",
PacketLineIn.END);
PacketLineIn pckIn = new PacketLineIn(recvStream);
assertThat(pckIn.readString(), is("shallow-info"));
// "base" is excluded, so its children are shallow.
assertThat(
Arrays.asList(pckIn.readString(), pckIn.readString()),
hasItems(
"shallow " + child1.toObjectId().getName(),
"shallow " + child2.toObjectId().getName()));
assertThat(pckIn.readString(), theInstance(PacketLineIn.DELIM));
assertThat(pckIn.readString(), is("packfile"));
parsePack(recvStream);
// Only the children are sent.
assertFalse(client.hasObject(base.toObjectId()));
assertTrue(client.hasObject(child1.toObjectId()));
assertTrue(client.hasObject(child2.toObjectId()));
}
@Test
public void testV2FetchUnrecognizedArgument() throws Exception {
thrown.expect(PackProtocolException.class);

View File

@ -208,10 +208,14 @@ RevCommit next() throws MissingObjectException,
!p.has(DEEPEN_NOT)) {
pending.add(p);
} else {
c.isBoundary = true;
dp.makesChildBoundary = true;
}
}
if (dp.makesChildBoundary) {
c.isBoundary = true;
}
// If the current commit has become unshallowed, everything
// below us is new to the client. Mark its parent as
// re-interesting, and carry that flag downward to all

View File

@ -112,14 +112,20 @@ public static class Commit extends RevCommit {
boolean isBoundary;
/**
* True if this commit was excluded due to a shallow fetch
* setting. All its children are thus boundary commits.
*/
boolean makesChildBoundary;
/** @return depth of this commit, as found by the shortest path. */
public int getDepth() {
return depth;
}
/**
* @return true if at least one of this commit's children was excluded
* due to a depth or shallow-since restriction, false otherwise
* @return true if at least one of this commit's parents was excluded
* due to a shallow fetch setting, false otherwise
* @since 5.2
*/
public boolean isBoundary() {