This was enabled unintentionally in 06fc6c7c and spams the test logs. We
can enable this when needed.
Change-Id: I9f3042c0e285ff236be65fcc02bdcfdb90efc3af
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>
- use slf4j-simple for logging in test runs
- for log configuration see
https://www.slf4j.org/api/org/slf4j/impl/SimpleLogger.html
Change-Id: I9f0a532644b31162c867cd0d63f083296eaf6be5
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>
By running FileSnapshotTest#detectFileModified we found that the sum of
measured filesystem timestamp resolution and measured clock resolution
may yield a too small interval after a file has been modified which we
need to consider racily clean. In our tests we didn't find this behavior
on all systems we tested on, e.g. on MacOS using APFS and Java 8 and 11
this effect was not observed.
On Linux (SLES 15, kernel 4.12.14-150.22-default) we collected the
following test results using Java 8 and 11:
In 23-98% of 10000 test runs (depending on filesystem type and Java
version) the test failed, which means the effective interval which needs
to be considered racily clean after a file was modified is larger than
the measured file timestamp resolution.
"delta" is the observed interval after a file has been modified but
FileSnapshot did not yet detect the modification:
"resolution" is the measured sum of file timestamp resolution and clock
resolution seen in Java.
Java version filesystem failures resolution min delta max delta
1.8.0_212-b04 btrfs 98.6% 1 ms 3.6 ms 6.6 ms
1.8.0_212-b04 ext4 82.6% 3 ms 1.1 ms 4.1 ms
1.8.0_212-b04 xfs 23.8% 4 ms 3.7 ms 3.9 ms
1.8.0_212-b04 zfs 23.1% 3 ms 4.8 ms 5.0 ms
11.0.3+7 btrfs 98.1% 3 us 0.7 ms 4.7 ms
11.0.3+7 ext4 98.1% 6 us 0.7 ms 4.7 ms
11.0.3+7 xfs 98.5% 7 us 0.1 ms 8.0 ms
11.0.3+7 zfs 98.4% 7 us 0.7 ms 5.2 ms
Mac OS
1.8.0_212 APFS 0% 1 s
11.0.3+7 APFS 0% 6 us
The observed delta is not distributed according to a normal gaussian
distribution but rather random in the observed range between "min delta"
and "max delta".
Run this test after measuring file timestamp resolution in
FS.FileAttributeCache to auto-configure JGit since it's unclear what
mechanism is causing this effect.
In FileSnapshot#isRacyClean use the maximum of the measured timestamp
resolution and the measured "delta" as explained above to decide if a
given FileSnapshot is to be considered racily clean. Add a 30% safety
margin to ensure we are on the safe side.
Change-Id: I1c8bb59f6486f174b7bbdc63072777ddbe06694d
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>
Checking lastModified is time critical hence debug trace is the only way
to analyze issues since debugging is impractical.
Also add configuration for buffering of log4j output to reduce runtime
impact when debug trace is on. Limit buffer to 1MiB and comment this
configuration out since we may not always want to use buffering.
Change-Id: Ib1a0537b67c8dc3fac994a77b42badd974ce6c97
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>
See previous attempt: https://git.eclipse.org/r/#/c/16674/
Here we preserve as much of JetS3t mode as possible
while allowing to use new Java 8+ PBE algorithms
such as PBEWithHmacSHA512AndAES_256
Summary of changes:
* change pom.xml to control long tests
* add WalkEncryptionTest.launch to run long tests
* add AmazonS3.Keys to to normalize use of constants
* change WalkEncryption to support AES in JetS3t mode
* add WalkEncryptionTest to test remote encryption pipeline
* add support for CI configuration for live Amazon S3 testing
* add log4j based logging for tests in both Eclipse and Maven build
To test locally, check out the review branch, then:
* create amazon test configuration file
* located your home dir: ${user.home}
* named jgit-s3-config.properties
* file format follows AmazonS3 connection settings file:
accesskey = your-amazon-access-key
secretkey = your-amazon-secret-key
test.bucket = your-bucket-for-testing
* finally:
* run in Eclipse: WalkEncryptionTest.launch
* or
* run in Shell: mvn test --define test=WalkEncryptionTest
Change-Id: I6f455fd9fb4eac261ca73d0bec6a4e7dae9f2e91
Signed-off-by: Andrei Pozolotin <andrei.pozolotin@gmail.com>