The change tries to make jgit behave more like native CLI git regarding
the negation rules. According to [1] "... prefix "!" which negates the
pattern; any matching file excluded by a previous pattern will become
included again." Negating the pattern should not automatically make the
file *not ignored* - other pattern rules have to be considered too.
The fix adds test cases for both bugs 448094 and 407475.
[1] https://www.kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/gitignore.html
Bug: 448094
Bug: 407475
Change-Id: I322954200dd3c683e3d8f4adc48506eb99e56ae1
Signed-off-by: Andrey Loskutov <loskutov@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>
Entries should only be written to the working tree managed by the
Repository. Simplify callers by passing only the entry and computing
the work tree location inside of the checkoutEntry method.
Change-Id: I574e41280d0407f1853fda12f4bd0d30f75d74e7
Callers should manage the ObjectReader, as this allows the JGit library to cache
context relevant information across files checked out at the same time. If the
caller only has one file to checkout, it should still explicitly manage the life
span of the ObjectReader.
Change-Id: Ib57fba6cb4b774ccff8c416ef4d32e2b390f16a9
To improve ignore parser performance we can avoid using java.util.regex
code on simple wildcard patterns with leading or trailing asterisk. As
those patterns represent a majority of ignore rules, the index diff
performance can be drastically increased on huge repository with lot of
ignore rules.
Bug: 450466
Change-Id: I80428441cc8d5de5468813f841d89322413eed8b
Signed-off-by: Andrey Loskutov <loskutov@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>
Actually the test only allows a range from [1,255], so let's name the
variable so.
Change-Id: Iecdb8149b83389c67e3cd2f64f4a654c175475be
Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
JGit style is to import exactly the classes required, and never
to use "import foo.*" as the foo package could add new classes
in the future which are conflicting/confusing with the imports
already used by a source file.
Change-Id: I5693408c777e5843ec65fff1163d5d717849fa34
The latest changes to IndexDiff just assumed that all configured
submodules are allways cloned. If a configured submodule did not exist
an exception was thrown. This is fixed by this commit.
Bug: 450567
Change-Id: Iabe3b196d998c19483082e5720038ebddaeb1890
In a situation where a certain path was ignored but a working tree file
with this path existed jgit didn't allow to checkout a branch which
didn't ignore this path but contained different content. JGit considered
this to be a checkout conflict to prevent overwriting the file in the
working tree and raised an error. This commit fixes this by ensuring
that ignored dirty working tree files don't lead to a checkout conflict.
Bug: 450169
Change-Id: I90288d314ffac73c24a9c70a5181f8243bd4679a
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>
For each submodule native git allows to configure which modifications to
submodules should be ignored by the status command. It is possible to
ignore "none", "all", "dirty", "untracked" [1]. This configuration is
now supported by IndexDiff. The StatusCommand offers the possibility to
specify this mode.
[1] http://git-scm.com/docs/gitmodules
Change-Id: Ifd81d574a680f9b4152945ba70f8ec4af4f452c9
The current IgnoreRule/FileNameMatcher implementation scales not well
with huge repositories - it is both slow and memory expensive while
parsing glob expressions (bug 440732). Addtitionally, the "double star"
pattern (/**/) is not understood by the old parser (bug 416348).
The proposed implementation is a complete clean room rewrite of the
gitignore parser, aiming to add missing double star pattern support and
improve the performance and memory consumption.
The glob expressions from .gitignore rules are converted to Java regular
expressions (java.util.regex.Pattern). java.util.regex.Pattern code can
evaluate expression from gitignore rules considerable faster (and with
less memory consumption) as the old FileNameMatcher implementation.
CQ: 8828
Bug: 416348
Bug: 440732
Change-Id: Ibefb930381f2f16eddb9947e592752f8ae2b76e1
Signed-off-by: Andrey Loskutov <loskutov@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>
ResetCommand threw an NPE if neither mode nor path was defined. Instead
it should default to a mixed reset like native git does.
Change-Id: I455902394f9e7b0c7afae42381f34838f7f2a138
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>
* stable-3.5:
Prepare 3.5.1-SNAPSHOT builds
JGit v3.5.0.201409260305-r
Fix PackWriterBitmapWalker handling non-existing uninteresting objects
Enable maven site generation for jgit
Generate javadocs as part of Maven site project reports
Compare API changes with clirr against 3.4.1
[cli] Use chaining credentials provider to enable .netrc
Add chaining credentials provider
[Java 8] Configure doclint to accept missing descriptions
Do not use .netrc implicitly if no CredentialsProvider was set
Prepare post 3.5.0-rc1 builds
JGit 3.5.0.201409071800-rc1
Fix the ls-remote command when there is no local repo
Change-Id: Iaa4485cac6ff9c7917380e89e12e416e0f52a557
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>
When writing new packs it should be allowed to specify objects as "have"
(objects which should not be included in the pack) which do not exist in
the local repository.
This works with the traditional PackWriter, but when PackWriter was
working on a repository with bitmap indexes and used
PackWriterBitmapWalker then this feature was broken. Non-existing "have"
objects lead to MissingObjectExceptions. That broke push and Gerrit
replication. When the replication target had branches unknown to the
replication source then the source repository wanted to build pack files
where "have" included branch-tips which were unknown in the source
repository.
Bug: 427107
Change-Id: I6b6598a1ec49af68aa77ea6f1f06e827982ea4ac
Also-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>
JGit should offer the possibility to do a garbage collection in
"aggressive" mode. In this mode garbage collection more aggressively
optimize the repository at the expense of taking much more time.
Technically a aggressive mode garbage collection differs from a
non-aggressive one by:
- not reusing packed objects found in old packs. Recompress every object
- the configuration pack.window is set to 250 (the default is 10)
- the configuration pack.depths is set to 250 (the default is 50)
The associated classes in org.eclipse.jgit.api and the command line
command in org.eclipse.jgit.pgm expose this new option.
The configuration parameters gc.aggressiveDepth and gc.aggressiveWindow
have been introduced to configure this feature.
Bug: 444332
Change-Id: I024101f2810acf6be13ce144c9893d98f5c4ae76
Set the commit message to be used for the merge commit (in case one is
created)
Bug: 442886
Change-Id: Ie5ecc13822faa366f00b3daa07f74c8441cae195
Signed-off-by: Axel Richard <axel.richard@obeo.fr>
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>
uninteresting
Using the ObjectWalk and marking a commit as uninteresting didn't mark
its root tree as uninteresting. This caused the "missing tree ..."
error in Gerrit under special circumstances. For example, if the
patch-set 2 changes only the commit message then the patch-set 1
and patch-set 2 share the same root-tree:
ps1 -> o o <- ps2
\ /
o root-tree
The transported pack will contain the ps2 commit but not the root-tree
object.
When using the BaseReceivePack.setCheckReferencedObjectsAreReachable
JGit will check the reachability of all referenced objects not provided
in the transported pack. Since the ps1 was advertised it will properly
be marked as uninteresting. However, the root-tree was reachable because
the ObjectWalk.markUninteresting missed to mark it as uninteresting.
JGit was then rejecting the pack with the "missing tree ..." exception.
Gerrit-issue: https://code.google.com/p/gerrit/issues/detail?id=1582
Change-Id: Iff2de8810f14ca304e6655fc8debeb8f3e20712b
Signed-off-by: Saša Živkov <sasa.zivkov@sap.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>
This matches what C Git does, see "stripped" in `man git-commit-tree`.
It also fixes the bug of the user where an user.email like "<>" would
show up as "<<>>" in EGit.
Bug: 439844
Change-Id: I567a3c620e191ce9d37d318417e63cb5d4483419
Signed-off-by: Robin Stocker <robin@nibor.org>
This reverts commit b646578d89.
openInputStream() is never used in JGit, nor is it used by any
known working DFS implementation. The method was added as a
utility for reading back from a DfsInserter, but the final
implementation of that feature does not requrire this method.
Change-Id: I075ad95e40af49c92b554480f8993ef5658f7684
In the DFS implementation, flushing an inserter writes a new pack to
the storage system and is potentially very slow, but was the only way
to ensure previously-inserted objects were available. For some tasks,
like performing a series of three-way merges, the total size of all
inserted objects may be small enough to avoid flushing the in-memory
buffered data.
DfsOutputStream already provides a read method to read back from the
not-yet-flushed data, so use this to provide an ObjectReader in the
DFS case.
In the file-backed case, objects are written out loosely on the fly,
so the implementation can just return the existing WindowCursor.
Change-Id: I454fdfb88f4d215e31b7da2b2a069853b197b3dd
Instead of passing on the start point as is to CreateBranchCommand, the
resolved ObjectId was used. Given this, CreateBranchCommand did not set
up tracking.
This also fixes CreateBranchCommand with setStartPoint(null) to use HEAD
(instead of NPEing), as documented in the Javadoc.
Bug: 441153
Change-Id: I5ed82b4a4b4a32a81a7fa2854636b921bcb3d471
Signed-off-by: Robin Stocker <robin@nibor.org>
JGit handled this case improperly which these tests demonstrate. Fixed
by I25915880f304090fe90584c79bddf021231227a2.
Bug: 440537
Change-Id: Ia29c1d6cf8c0ce724cc3ff5ed9e0b396949b44bf
Signed-off-by: Laurent Goubet <laurent.goubet@obeo.fr>
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>
If the IndexDiffFilter is asked whether it should include or filter out
a certain path and for that path there is a dircache entry with a stage
different from 0, then the filter should never filter out this entry.
IndexDiffFilter is an optimized version of AnyDiffFilter and there is no
case where the index contains non-0 stages but we still don't see any
diff for that path.
Change-Id: I25915880f304090fe90584c79bddf021231227a2
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>
The fix is to move the new head commit to the newly-created revert
commit, so that additional revert commits will use the correct head.
Change-Id: I5de3a9a2a4c276e60af732e9c507cbbdfd1a4652
Signed-off-by: Maik Schreiber <blizzy@blizzy.de>
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>
Apparently repo allows projects overlapping, e.g. one project's path is "foo"
and another project's path is "foo/bar". This is not supported in git submodule.
At JGit repo side we'll skip all the submodules that are in subdirectories of
other submodules, and on repo side we'll make them submodules to resolve this
problem.
Change-Id: I6820c4ef400c530a36150b1228706adfcc43ef64
Signed-off-by: Yuxuan 'fishy' Wang <fishywang@google.com>
Previously when RecursiveMerger was trying to create a single virtual
common base for the merge it was failing when this lead to content-merge
conflicts. This is different from what native git is doing. When native
git's recursive merge algorithm creates a new common base it will merge
the multiple parents and simply take the merge result (potentially
including conflict markers) as common base. See my discussion with Shawn
here: http://www.spinics.net/lists/git/msg234959.html :
> - How should workingtree, index (stage1,2,3) look like if during
that
> merge of common ancestors a conflict occurs? Will I see in stage2
and
> stage3 really see content of X1 and X2?
Its done entirely in memory and never touches the working tree or
index. When a conflict exists in the X1-X2 merge the conflict is
preserved into the new virtual base.
There is still the possibility that the merge of parents lead to
conflicts. File/Folder conclicts, conflicts on filemodes. This commit
only fixes the situation for conflicts when merging content.
Bug: 438203
Change-Id: If45bc3d078b3d3de87b758e71d7379059d709603
When RecursiveMerger tried to determine a common base tree it was
recursively tried to merge multiple common bases. But these intermediate
merges which have just been done to determine a single common base for
the final merge already filled some important fields (toBeCheckedOut,
toBeDeleted, ...). These side effects of the intermediate merges led to
wrong results of the final merge. One symptom was that after a recursive
merge which should be succesful you could still see leftover files in
the worktree: files which existed in the (virtual) common base but which
don't exist anymore in the branches to be merged.
The solution is easy: Clear the appropriate fields after common base
determination and start the final merge with a clean state.
Change-Id: I644ea9e1cb15360f7901bc0483cdb9286308c226
Signed-off-by: Robin Rosenberg <robin.rosenberg@dewire.com>
As described in native gits file "git-read-tree.txt" git has in a
special mode when doing the "initial" checkout. "Initial" means that the
index is empty before the checkout. This was not handled correctly in
JGit and is fixed in this commit. Also see
https://github.com/git/git/blob/master/Documentation/git-read-tree.txt#L181
Change-Id: I9b9d1bd9ebf349cfca420c891c7b099a18d07ba4
Setting branch.<name>.rebase or pull.rebase to 'preserve' will preserve
merges during rebase. Also, pull.rebase is now consulted if there is no
branch-specific configuration.
Bug: 429664
Change-Id: I345fa295c7e774e0d0a8e6aba30fbfc3552e0084
Signed-off-by: Konrad Kügler <swamblumat-eclipsebugs@yahoo.de>
With --preserve-merges C Git re-does merges using the rewritten merge
parents, discarding the old merge commit. For the common use-case of
pull with rebase this is unfortunate, as it loses the merge conflict
resolution (and other fixes in the merge), which may have taken quite
some time to get right in the first place.
To overcome this we use a two-fold approach:
If any of the (non-first) merge parents of a merge were rewritten, we
also redo the merge, to include the (potential) new changes in those
commits.
If only the first parent was rewritten, i.e. we are merging a branch
that is otherwise unaffected by the rebase, we instead cherry-pick the
merge commit at hand. This is done with the --mainline 1 and --no-commit
options to apply the changes introduced by the merge. Then we set up an
appropriate MERGE_HEAD and commit the result, thus effectively forging a
merge.
Apart from the approach taken to rebase merge commits, this
implementation closely follows C Git. As a result, both Git
implementations can continue rebases of each other.
Preserving merges works for both interactive and non-interactive rebase,
but as in C Git it is easy do get undesired outcomes with interactive
rebase.
CommitCommand supports committing merges during rebase now.
Bug: 439421
Change-Id: I4cf69b9d4ec6109d130ab8e3f42fcbdac25a13b2
Signed-off-by: Konrad Kügler <swamblumat-eclipsebugs@yahoo.de>
DiffFormatter now suports either side being null and the log program
will output the diff for the first commit.
Bug: 395791
Change-Id: I378957b57e9ad1f7195ba416f402178453f0ebd3
Andrey Loskutov