Compile each test in its own java_test() target so they can run in
parallel, reducing total time spent testing on large machines.
$ buck test --all
[-] PROCESSING BUCK FILES...FINISHED 0.3s [100%]
[-] BUILDING...FINISHED 2.9s [100%] (351/383 JOBS, 351 UPDATED, 0.0% CACHE MISS)
[-] TESTING...FINISHED 98.1s (3360 PASS/15 SKIP/0 FAIL)
Change-Id: I8d6541268315089299f933ed23d785b1b3431133
Construct the java_application JAR wrapped with the shell script
header. This is enough to clone a repository over HTTPs:
$ buck build :jgit_bin
$ buck-out/gen/jgit_bin/jgit_bin clone https://...
Change-Id: I4aceb4e77b2ec9be76a32ec93d94f2dafe9acce6
Today there are plenty of modern build tool systems available in the
wild (in no particular order):
* http://bazel.io
* https://pantsbuild.github.io
* http://shakebuild.com
* https://ninja-build.org
* https://buckbuild.com
The attributes, that all these build tools have in common, are:
* reliable
* correct
* very fast
* reproducible
It must not always be the other build tool, this project is currently
using. Or, quoting Gerrit Code Review maintainer here:
"Friends, don't let friends use <the other build tool system>!"
This change is non-complete implementation of JGit build in Buck,
needed by Gerrit Code Review to replace its dependency with standlone
JGit cell. This is very useful when a developer is working on both
projects and is trying to integrate changes made in JGit in Gerrit.
The supported workflow is:
$ cd jgit
$ emacs <hack>
$ cd ../gerrit
$ buck build --config repositories.jgit=../jgit gerrit
With --config repositories.jgit=../jgit jgit cell is routed through
JGit development tree.
To build jgit, issue:
$ buck build //:jgit
[-] PROCESSING BUCK FILES...FINISHED 0,0s
Yes, you can't measure no-op build time, given that Buck daemon is
used.
Change-Id: I301a71b19fba35a5093d8cc64d4ba970c2877a44
Signed-off-by: David Ostrovsky <david@ostrovsky.org>
Shawn Pearce