For example, instead of using
public @NonNull String getMyFavoriteString() { ... }
use
@NonNull
public String getMyFavoriteString() { ... }
This makes the style more consistent (the existing JGit code base
tends to lean toward the second style) and makes the source code
better reflect how the annotation is parsed, as a METHOD annotation.
Longer term, we should switch to a TYPE_USE annotation and switch to
the first style.
Noticed using a style checker that follows
https://google.github.io/styleguide/javaguide.html#s4.8.5-annotations
Change-Id: I9b9fa08035d805ca660520f812a84d2f47eff507
Reported-by: Ivan Frade <ifrade@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrn@google.com>
For example, instead of using
public @Nullable String getMyFavoriteString() { ... }
use
@Nullable
public String getMyFavoriteString() { ... }
This makes the style more consistent (the existing JGit code base
tends to lean toward the second style) and makes the source code
better reflect how the annotation is parsed, as a METHOD annotation.
Longer term, we should switch to a TYPE_USE annotation and switch to
the first style.
Noticed using a style checker that follows
https://google.github.io/styleguide/javaguide.html#s4.8.5-annotations
Change-Id: I07f4e67cc149fb8007f696a4663e10d4bfc57e3a
Reported-by: Ivan Frade <ifrade@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrn@google.com>
As described in the javadoc for org.eclipse.jgit.annotations.Nullable:
Warning: Please do not use this annotation on arrays. Different
annotation processors treat `@Nullable Object[]` differently: some
treat it as an array of nullable objects, for consistency with
versions of `Nullable` defined with `@Target TYPE_USE`, while others
treat it as a nullable array of objects. JGit therefore avoids using
this annotation on arrays altogether.
See the checker-framework manual[1] for details.
[1] http://types.cs.washington.edu/checker-framework/current/checker-framework-manual.html#faq-array-syntax-meaning
Change-Id: I14ffcf80adbb8145d797998de2f2fa6ab84c3ae3
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrn@google.com>
Previous commits block the addition to the repo of dangerous .gitmodules
files, but some could have been committed before those safeguards where
in place.
Add a check in DfsFsck to validate the .gitmodules files in the repo.
Use the same validation than the ReceivePack, translating the
results to FsckErrors.
Note that *all* .gitmodules files in the storage will be checked, not
only the latest version.
Change-Id: I040cf1f31a779419aad0292ba5e6e76eb7f32b66
Signed-off-by: Ivan Frade <ifrade@google.com>
errorType is already null in the caller and callee when unknown, so we
can replace a conditional call to a setter in the only caller with an
unconditionally provided @Nullable constructor parameter.
As a bonus, this lets us mark the field as final.
Change-Id: Ie2f929180e74ffa1aba8ec6caccfa81fbd8bfc04
Signed-off-by: Ivan Frade <ifrade@google.com>
The fsck test needs more detail about the error than an IOException
with an explanatory message.
Add an error identifier to the SubmoduleValidatorException and make
it the only throwable exception when parsing a file.
Change-Id: Ic3f0955b497e1681b25e681e1282e876cdf3d2c5
Signed-off-by: Ivan Frade <ifrade@google.com>
A .gitmodules file can include a submodule without a path to configure
the URL for a submodule that is only present on other branches.
A .gitmodules file can include a submodule with no URL and no path to
reserve the name for a submodule that existed in earlier history but
is not available from any URL any more.
"git fsck" permits both of these cases. Permit them in JGit as well
(instead of throwing NullPointerException).
Change-Id: I3b442639ad79ea7a59227f96406a12e62d3573ae
Reported-by: David Pursehouse <david.pursehouse@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrn@google.com>
This was not updated with the original introduction of the new method.
Bug: 534731
Change-Id: Ic4589c3a209109a829fbb706a9bf38845134e904
Signed-off-by: Michael Keppler <Michael.Keppler@gmx.de>
Since v4.7.5.201810051826-r~3 (SubmoduleAddCommand: Reject submodule
URIs that look like cli options, 2018-09-24), SubmoduleAddCommand
checks submodule names for ".." path components in
assertValidSubmoduleName. This additional check for the same is
redundant.
Change-Id: I993326a370978880b690dc133a81fa3025935bcb
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrn@gmail.com>
The text "<tree, blob>" with angle brackets should not be used in javadoc
since it is interpreted as an HTML tag and then rejected since it's not a
valid HTML tag. Wrap the text in a @literal tag.
Also add a missing space.
Change-Id: Ide045e8c04a39a916f5b2e964e58c151e4555830
Signed-off-by: David Pursehouse <david.pursehouse@gmail.com>
The main concern are submodule urls starting with '-' that could pass as
options to an unguarded tool.
Pass through the parser the ids of blobs identified as .gitmodules
files in the ObjectChecker. Load the blobs and parse/validate them
in SubmoduleValidator.
Change-Id: Ia0cc32ce020d288f995bf7bc68041fda36be1963
Signed-off-by: Ivan Frade <ifrade@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>
In order to validate .gitmodules files, we first need to find them
in the incoming pack.
Do it in the ObjectChecker stage. Check in the tree objects if they
point to a .gitmodules file and report the tree id and the .gitmodules
blob id.
This can be used later to check if the file is in the root of the
project and if the contents are good.
While we're here, make isMacHFSGit more accurate by detecting variants
of filenames that vary in case.
[jn: tweaked NTFS and HFS+ checking; added more tests]
Change-Id: I70802e7d2c1374116149de4f89836b9498f39582
Signed-off-by: Ivan Frade <ifrade@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrn@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>
In C git versions before 2.19.1, the submodule is fetched by running
"git clone <uri> <path>". A URI starting with "-" would be interpreted
as an option, causing security problems. See CVE-2018-17456.
Refuse to add submodules with URIs, names or paths starting with "-",
that could be confused with command line arguments.
[jn: backported to JGit 4.7.y, bringing portions of Masaya Suzuki's
dotdot check code in v5.1.0.201808281540-m3~57 (Add API to specify
the submodule name, 2018-07-12) along for the ride]
Change-Id: I2607c3acc480b75ab2b13386fe2cac435839f017
Signed-off-by: Ivan Frade <ifrade@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>
EolStreamTypeUtil didn't handle these correctly on Windows.
Add three new tests to verify that the crlf attribute is handled as
described at [1], and that core.eol=native produces the expected
line endings on check-out.
[1] https://git-scm.com/docs/gitattributes
Bug: 497290
Change-Id: Idd9b435e3256c1e3251cc7b966f2f0460e787f07
Signed-off-by: Thomas Wolf <thomas.wolf@paranor.ch>
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>
Breaking implementers is ok in a minor version update following OSGi
semantic versioning. According to [1] adding a default method is ok if
risk of inheriting a method with the same name from multiple interfaces
is low.
[1] https://wiki.eclipse.org/Evolving_Java-based_APIs_2#Evolving_API_Interfaces
Change-Id: Iad354cb73cfff9a96b9a9852a3c4d9ba0c5df430
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>
According to Error Prone, the class should also override:
int read(byte[], int, int)
otherwise multi-byte reads from this input stream are likely to be slow.
See https://errorprone.info/bugpattern/InputStreamSlowMultibyteRead
Change-Id: I33ab8cd30013447f2a0363b3a7b1424b79cb1818
Signed-off-by: David Pursehouse <david.pursehouse@gmail.com>
Jonathan Nieder