When creating a new PackFile instance it is specified whether this pack
has an associated bitmap index file or not. This information is cached
and the public method getBitmapIndex() will always assume a bitmap index
file must exist if the cached data tells so. But it may happen that the
packfiles are repacked during a gc in a different process causing the
packfile, bitmap-index and index file to be deleted. Since JGit still
has an open FileHandle on the packfile this file is not really deleted
and can still be accessed. But index and bitmap index file are deleted.
Fix getBitmapIndex() to invalidate the cached packfile instance if such
a situation occurs.
This problem showed up when a gerrit server was serving repositories
which where garbage collected with native git regularly. Fetch and
clone commands for certain repositories failed permanently after a
native git gc had deleted old bitmap index files.
Change-Id: I8e620bec74dd3f310ba42024f9a657062f868f0e
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>
If the repository close method was called twice (or more) for one open,
the usage count became negative and the repository was never be evicted
from the cache because the method checking if repository is expired was
not considering negative usage count.
Change-Id: I18a80c415c54c37d1b9def2b311ff2d0afa455ca
Signed-off-by: Hugo Arès <hugo.ares@ericsson.com>
There was a bug when carrying over flags from a merge commit to its
non-first parents. The first parent of a merge commit was handled
differently and correct but the non-first parents are handled by a
recursive algorithm. Flags should be copied from the root merge commit
to parent-2, to grandparent-2, ... up to the limit of STACK_DEPTH==500
parents-levels. But the recursive algorithm was always copying only to
the direct parents of the merge commit and not the grand*-parents.
This seems to be no problem when commits are handled in a strict date
order because then copying only one level is no problem if children are
handled before parents. But when commits are not seperated anymore by
distinctive correct dates (e.g. because all commits have the same date)
then it may happen that a merge-parent is handled before the merge
commit and when dealing later with the merge commit one has to copy
flags down to more than one level
Bug: 501211
Change-Id: I2d79a7cf1e3bce21a490905ccd9d5e502d7b8421
BranchConfig treated this config property as a boolean, but git also
allows the values "preserve" and "interactive". Config property
pull.rebase also allows the same values.
Replace private enum PullCommand.PullRebaseMode by new public enum
BranchConfig.BranchRebaseMode and adapt all uses. Add a new setter to
PullCommand.
Note: PullCommand will treat "interactive" like "true", i.e., as a
non-interactive rebase. Not sure how "interactive" should be handled.
At least it won't balk on it.
Bug: 499482
Change-Id: I7309360f5662b2c2efa1bd8ea6f112c63cf064af
Signed-off-by: Thomas Wolf <thomas.wolf@paranor.ch>
Change-Id: I6691b454404dd4db3c690ecfc7515de765bc2ef7
Signed-off-by: Martin Goellnitz <m.goellnitz@outlook.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>
- enhance FS.readPipe to throw an exception if the external command
fails to enable the caller to handle the command failure
- reduce log level to warning if system git config does not exist
- improve log message
Bug: 476639
Change-Id: I94ae3caec22150dde81f1ea8e1e665df55290d42
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>
Without the bridge JGit tests don't show log output in Eclipse console.
Change-Id: I7acce1f1787960b5ca98377cb5c7f599a8a220b5
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>
Since 4.0 JGit does no longer support Java versions older than Java 7 so
there is no need anymore to mention Java 7 in the class name.
Change-Id: Ic46c9d89a7e919ae4a69487fa06de0478d2b21f0
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>
Refactor all of the push option support code to allocate the list
immediately before parsing the options section off the stream.
Move option support down to ReceivePack instead of BaseReceivePack.
Push options are specific to the ReceivePack protocol and are not
likely to appear in the 4 year old subscription proposal. These
changes are OK before JGit 4.5 ships as no consumer should be relying
on these new APIs.
Change-Id: Ib07d18c877628aba07da07cd91875f918d509c49
Initialize pushOptions when we decide to use them, instead of when we
advertise them.
In the case of HTTP the advertisement is in a different network
request, hence in a different instance of the BaseReceivePack.
Change-Id: I094c60942e04de82cb6d8433c9cd43a46ffae332
Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
DfsRefDatabase#compareAndPut had a vague semantics for reference
matching. Because of this, an operation to make a symbolic
reference had been broken for some DFS implementations even if they
followed the contract of compareAndPut. The clarified semantics
requires the implementations to satisfy the followings:
* Matching references should be both symbolic references or both
object ID references.
* If both are symbolic references, both should have the same target
name.
* If both are object ID references, both should have the same object
ID.
This semantics is defined based on
https://git.eclipse.org/r/#/c/77416/. Before this commit,
DfsRefDatabase couldn't see the target of symbolic references.
InMemoryRepository is changed to comply with the new semantics. This
semantics change can affect the existing DFS implementations that only
checks object IDs. This commit adds two tests that the previous
InMemoryRepository couldn't pass.
Change-Id: I6c6b5d3cc8241a81f4a37782381c88e8a59fdf15
Signed-off-by: Masaya Suzuki <masayasuzuki@google.com>
The RepositoryTestCase hierarchy no longer comes from TestCase, so all
test methods must have @Test.
Fix one test that was broken but never run; fortunately this was just
a typo in the test code.
Change-Id: I3ac8ccdab5e2d5539c63d7b0a88d8bdb0c5ff66e
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>
This fixes the tests failed in JDK8.
FS uses java.nio API to get file attributes. The timestamps obtained
from that API are more precise than the ones from
java.io.File#lastModified() since Java8.
This difference accidentally makes JGit detect newly added files as
smudged. Use the precised timestamp to avoid this false positive.
Bug: 500058
Change-Id: I9e587583c85cb6efa7562ad6c5f26577869a2e7c
Signed-off-by: Masaya Suzuki <masayasuzuki@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrey Loskutov <loskutov@gmx.de>
This will be used by EGit for implementing commit amend in the staging
view (see Idcd1efeeee8b3065bae36e285bfc0af24ab1e88f).
Change-Id: Ice9ebbb1c0c3314c679f4db40cdd3664f61c27c3
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>
This fixes the warning "src/ is missing from source.."
Change-Id: I166e3a6a3d5230e4110d3283ec4dbc7d1dfe6732
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>
* changes:
LfsProtocolServlet: Allow access to objects in request
LfsProtocolServlet: Allow getLargeFileRepository to raise exceptions
Remove references to org.eclipse.jgit.java7
cgit changed the --depth parameter to mean the total depth of history
rather than the depth of ancestors to be returned [1]. JGit still uses
the latter meaning, so update it to match cgit.
depth=0 still means a non-shallow clone. depth=1 now means only the
wants rather than the wants and their direct parents.
This is accomplished by changing the semantic meaning of "depth" in
UploadPack and PackWriter to mean the total depth of history desired,
while keeping "depth" in DepthWalk.{RevWalk,ObjectWalk} to mean
the depth of traversal. Thus UploadPack and PackWriter always
initialize their DepthWalks with "depth-1".
[1] upload-pack: fix off-by-one depth calculation in shallow clone
https://code.googlesource.com/git/+/682c7d2f1a2d1a5443777237450505738af2ff1a
Change-Id: I87ed3c0f56c37e3491e367a41f5e555c4207ff44
Signed-off-by: Terry Parker <tparker@google.com>
When fetching from a shallow clone, the client sends "have" lines
to tell the server about objects it already has and "shallow" lines
to tell where its local history terminates. In some circumstances,
the server fails to honor the shallow lines and fails to return
objects that the client needs.
UploadPack passes the "have" lines to PackWriter so PackWriter can
omit them from the generated pack. UploadPack processes "shallow"
lines by calling RevWalk.assumeShallow() with the set of shallow
commits. RevWalk creates and caches RevCommits for these shallow
commits, clearing out their parents. That way, walks correctly
terminate at the shallow commits instead of assuming the client has
history going back behind them. UploadPack converts its RevWalk to an
ObjectWalk, maintaining the cached RevCommits, and passes it to
PackWriter.
Unfortunately, to support shallow fetches the PackWriter does the
following:
if (shallowPack && !(walk instanceof DepthWalk.ObjectWalk))
walk = new DepthWalk.ObjectWalk(reader, depth);
That is, when the client sends a "deepen" line (fetch --depth=<n>)
and the caller has not passed in a DepthWalk.ObjectWalk, PackWriter
throws away the RevWalk that was passed in and makes a new one. The
cleared parent lists prepared by RevWalk.assumeShallow() are lost.
Fortunately UploadPack intends to pass in a DepthWalk.ObjectWalk.
It tries to create it by calling toObjectWalkWithSameObjects() on
a DepthWalk.RevWalk. But it doesn't work: because DepthWalk.RevWalk
does not override the standard RevWalk#toObjectWalkWithSameObjects
implementation, the result is a plain ObjectWalk instead of an
instance of DepthWalk.ObjectWalk.
The result is that the "shallow" information is thrown away and
objects reachable from the shallow commits can be omitted from the
pack sent when fetching with --depth from a shallow clone.
Multiple factors collude to limit the circumstances under which this
bug can be observed:
1. Commits with depth != 0 don't enter DepthGenerator's pending queue.
That means a "have" cannot have any effect on DepthGenerator unless
it is also a "want".
2. DepthGenerator#next() doesn't call carryFlagsImpl(), so the
uninteresting flag is not propagated to ancestors there even if a
"have" is also a "want".
3. JGit treats a depth of 1 as "1 past the wants".
Because of (2), the only place the UNINTERESTING flag can leak to a
shallow commit's parents is in the carryFlags() call from
markUninteresting(). carryFlags() only traverses commits that have
already been parsed: commits yet to be parsed are supposed to inherit
correct flags from their parent in PendingGenerator#next (which
doesn't happen here --- that is (2)). So the list of commits that have
already been parsed becomes relevant.
When we hit the markUninteresting() call, all "want"s, "have"s, and
commits to be unshallowed have been parsed. carryFlags() only
affects the parsed commits. If the "want" is a direct parent of a
"have", then it carryFlags() marks it as uninteresting. If the "have"
was also a "shallow", then its parent pointer should have been null
and the "want" shouldn't have been marked, so we see the bug. If the
"want" is a more distant ancestor then (2) keeps the uninteresting
state from propagating to the "want" and we don't see the bug. If the
"shallow" is not also a "have" then the shallow commit isn't parsed
so (2) keeps the uninteresting state from propagating to the "want
so we don't see the bug.
Here is a reproduction case (time flowing left to right, arrows
pointing to parents). "C" must be a commit that the client
reports as a "have" during negotiation. That can only happen if the
server reports it as an existing branch or tag in the first round of
negotiation:
A <-- B <-- C <-- D
First do
git clone --depth 1 <repo>
which yields D as a "have" and C as a "shallow" commit. Then try
git fetch --depth 1 <repo> B:refs/heads/B
Negotiation sets up: have D, shallow C, have C, want B.
But due to this bug B is marked as uninteresting and is not sent.
Change-Id: I6e14b57b2f85e52d28cdcf356df647870f475440
Signed-off-by: Terry Parker <tparker@google.com>
The bundle org.eclipse.jgit.java7 was removed in 4.0.
Remove references to it from the README.md.
Remove reference to it from org.eclipse.jgit.test/.project, which
causes an error message when opening the project in Eclipse:
Resource '/org.eclipse.jgit.java7' does not exist.
Change-Id: If0dbd562dcd60550bec3c0f793289474b7624bce
Signed-off-by: David Pursehouse <david.pursehouse@gmail.com>
When doing an incremental fetch from JGit, "have" commits are marked
as "uninteresting". In a non-shallow fetch, when the RevWalk hits an
"uninteresting" commit it marks the commit's corresponding tree as
uninteresting. That has the effect of dropping those trees and all the
trees and blobs they reference out of the thin pack returned to the
client.
However, shallow fetches use a DepthWalk to limit the RevWalk, which
nearly always causes the RevWalk to terminate before encountering the
"have" commits. As a result the pack created for the incremental fetch
never encounters "uninteresting" tree objects and thus includes
duplicate objects that it knows the client already has.
Change-Id: I7b1f7c3b0d83e04d34cd2fa676f1ad4fec904c05
Signed-off-by: Terry Parker <tparker@google.com>
Previously jgit would attempt to clean git repositories that had not
been committed by calling a non-recursive delete on them, which would
fail as they are directories. This commit addresses that issue in the
following ways.
Repositories are skipped in a default clean, similarly to cgit and only
cleaned when the force flag is applied. When the force flag is applied
repositories are deleted using a recursive delete call. The force flag
and setForce method are added here to CleanCommand to support this
change.
Bug: 498367
Change-Id: Ib6cfff65a033d0d0f76395060bf76719e13fc467
Signed-off-by: Matthaus Owens <matthaus@puppetlabs.com>
This commit adds some test coverage to cleaning a repository with a
submodule, which did not previously exist.
Bug: 498367
Change-Id: Ia5c4e4cc53488800dd486f8556dc57656783f1c4
Signed-off-by: Matthaus Owens <matthaus@puppetlabs.com>
This prevents the warning:
Potential heap pollution via varargs parameter
The method doesn't do any casting of types that would cause the heap
pollution, so it should be safe to add @SafeVarArgs.
See [1] for information about this warning.
[1] http://stackoverflow.com/a/12462259/381622
Change-Id: Ic6d252915ea44b4f1c385afecb98906cd2c54382
Signed-off-by: David Pursehouse <david.pursehouse@gmail.com>
* stable-4.4:
JGit v4.4.1.201607150455-r
RefDirectory: remove ref lock file for following ref dir removal
Change-Id: Ifc8a782efd7f2f991e70ad2a3691a8dba66c7554
Signed-off-by: David Pursehouse <david.pursehouse@gmail.com>
Gerrit's superproject subscription feature uses RefSpecs to formalize
the ACLs of when the superproject subscription feature is allowed.
As this is a slightly different use case than describing a local/remote
pair of refs, we need to be more permissive. Specifically we want to allow:
refs/heads/*
refs/heads/*:refs/heads/master
refs/heads/master:refs/heads/*
Introduce a new constructor, that allows constructing these RefSpecs.
Change-Id: I46c0bea9d876e61eb2c8d50f404b905792bc72b3
Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
We had a case in Gerrits superproject subscriptions where
'refs/heads/' was configured with the intention to mean 'refs/heads/*'.
The first expression lacks the '*', which is why it is not considered
a wildcard but it was considered valid and so was not found early to be
a typo.
Refs are not allowed to end with '/' anyway, so add a check for that.
Change-Id: I3ffdd9002146382acafb4fbc310a64af4cc1b7a9
Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
Example usage:
$ ./jgit push \
--push-option "Reviewer=j.doe@example.org" \
--push-option "<arbitrary string>" \
origin HEAD:refs/for/master
Stefan Beller has also made an equivalent change to CGit:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/299872
Change-Id: I6797e50681054dce3bd179e80b731aef5e200d77
Signed-off-by: Dan Wang <dwwang@google.com>
Matthias Sohn