From 1ffbbddc1aabbaf0447adc255ccaa89f17ed423f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Motiejus=20Jak=C5=A1tys?= Date: Fri, 7 May 2021 15:20:56 +0300 Subject: [PATCH] cite the figure differently --- IV/mj-msc.tex | 8 +++++--- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/IV/mj-msc.tex b/IV/mj-msc.tex index ff9193b..fb80c22 100644 --- a/IV/mj-msc.tex +++ b/IV/mj-msc.tex @@ -43,6 +43,7 @@ \newcommand{\onpage}[1]{\ref{#1} on page~\pageref{#1}} \newcommand{\titlecite}[1]{\citetitle{#1}\cite{#1}} +\newcommand{\titleciteauthor}[1]{\citetitle{#1} by \citeauthor{#1}\cite{#1}} \newcommand{\DP}{Douglas \& Peucker} \newcommand{\VW}{Visvalingam--Whyatt} \newcommand{\WM}{Wang--M{\"u}ller} @@ -436,13 +437,14 @@ limiting the problem to cartographic line generalization. That is, full cartographic generalization, which takes topology and other feature classes into account, is out of scope. -Figure~\onpage{fig:wang125} illustrates {\WM} algorithm from their original +Figure~\ref{fig:wang125} illustrates {\WM} algorithm from their original paper. Note how the long bends retain curvy, and how some small bends got exaggerated. \begin{figure}[h] - \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{wang125} - \caption{Originally Figure 12.5 from \titlecite{wang1998line}} + \centering + \includegraphics[width=.8\textwidth]{wang125} + \caption{Originally Figure 12.5 from \cite{wang1998line}.} \label{fig:wang125} \end{figure}