motiejus/stud

commit 69711bb841a90a8f04bbf4c58b4800d6396c33b6 (tree)
parent 4a582eef36bff7ef6df5fa7a4c5743076c21edc5
Author: Motiejus Jakštys <motiejus@uber.com>
Date:   Sun, 16 May 2021 18:16:31 +0300

fix figures

Diffstat:
M
IV/mj-msc.tex
 | 
6
+++---

1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/IV/mj-msc.tex b/IV/mj-msc.tex
@@ -1417,7 +1417,7 @@ sharp edges for others.
 \subsubsection{Large-scale (1:\numprint{250000})}
 \label{sec:analyzed-large-scale}
 
-As visible in figure~\ref{fig:salvis-wm-250k}, for large-scale map, some of the
+As visible in figure~\ref{fig:salvis-wm-250k-10x}, for large-scale map, some of the
 resulting bends look significantly exaggerated. Why is that?
 Figure~\ref{fig:salvis-wm-250k-overlaid-zoom} zooms in the large-scale
 simplification and overlays the original.
@@ -1432,11 +1432,11 @@ simplification and overlays the original.
     \hfill
     \begin{subfigure}[b]{.49\textwidth}
         \centering
-        \includegraphics[width=.2\textwidth]{salvis-wm-250k}
+        \includegraphics[width=.2\textwidth]{salvis-wm-250k-10x}
         \caption{Simplified.}
     \end{subfigure}
     \caption{GDB10LT simplified with {\WM} for 1:\numprint{250000}.}
-    \label{fig:salvis-wm-250k}
+    \label{fig:salvis-wm-250k-10x}
 \end{figure}
 
 \begin{figure}[ht]