example bends generalized
This commit is contained in:
@@ -52,6 +52,16 @@ connect rivers first to a single polylines:
|
||||
ideal hypothesis: mueller algorithm + topology may fully realize cartographic generalization tasks.
|
||||
|
||||
what scales and what distances?
|
||||
|
||||
= Intro: Aktualumas
|
||||
FOSS nėra realizuotas tinkamas kartografinio realizavimo algoritmas (2–3 sakiniai). Kad kartografai turėtų
|
||||
įrankį upių generalizavimui.
|
||||
|
||||
Bazė: imame tai, ką dabar turi kartografai įrankių paletėj.
|
||||
|
||||
Imti mažus upės vingius. Paimti mažas atkarpėles ir palyginti su originalia.
|
||||
Todėl, kad nėra kilpų.
|
||||
|
||||
\fi
|
||||
|
||||
\author{Motiejus Jakštys}
|
||||
@@ -203,11 +213,11 @@ retained.
|
||||
To sum up, both {\VW} and {\DP} simplify the lines, but their cartographic
|
||||
output poorly represents lines and bends. Where to look for better output?
|
||||
|
||||
\section{Suggested alternative}
|
||||
\label{sec:suggested_alternative}
|
||||
\subsection{Combining bends}
|
||||
|
||||
{\WM} observed how professional cartographers are simplifying rivers and encoded it
|
||||
to an algorithm which can be implemented by a computer.
|
||||
Consecutive small bends should be combined into larger bends, and that is one
|
||||
of the least developed aspects of automatic line generalization, according to
|
||||
\cite{miuller1995generalization}. {\WM} encoded this process to an algorithm.
|
||||
|
||||
Imagine there are two small bends close to each other, similar to
|
||||
figure~\ref{pic:example-bend} on page~\pageref{pic:example-bend}, and one needs
|
||||
@@ -216,22 +226,20 @@ straight line, but too small to retain both and retain their complexity.
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{figure}[h]
|
||||
\centering
|
||||
\begin{tikzpicture}[xscale=.5]
|
||||
\draw (-4,-1) -- (-1, -1);
|
||||
\draw (-1,-1) cos (0,0) sin (1,1) cos (2,0) sin (3,-1) cos (4,0) sin (5,1) cos(6,0) sin (7,-1);
|
||||
\draw (7,-1) -- (10, -1);
|
||||
\end{tikzpicture}
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=52mm]{sinewave}
|
||||
\caption{Example river bend that should be generalized}
|
||||
\label{pic:example-bend}
|
||||
\label{pic:sinewave}
|
||||
\end{figure}
|
||||
|
||||
We would imagine
|
||||
When one applies {\DP} to figure~\ref{pic:sinewave}, either both bends remain,
|
||||
or become a straight line.
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{itemize}
|
||||
\item Describe algorithm by {\WM}.
|
||||
\item Explain how outputs will differ.
|
||||
\item Explain implementation plan?
|
||||
\end{itemize}
|
||||
\begin{figure}[h]
|
||||
\centering
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=52mm]{sinewave-douglas-5}
|
||||
\caption{Example bend, generalized}
|
||||
\label{pic:sinewave-douglas-5}
|
||||
\end{figure}
|
||||
|
||||
\section{Related Work and future suggestions}
|
||||
\label{sec:related_work}
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user