From 7bdc4453bb644113c74a89ad3945101200139b82 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Motiejus=20Jak=C5=A1tys?= <desired.mta@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 May 2020 07:42:43 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] conclusions and suggested altarnative

---
 II/Referatas/mj-referatas.tex | 15 ++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/II/Referatas/mj-referatas.tex b/II/Referatas/mj-referatas.tex
index ca488f9..9ad1bc5 100644
--- a/II/Referatas/mj-referatas.tex
+++ b/II/Referatas/mj-referatas.tex
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
 
 \newcommand{\DP}{Douglas \& Peucker}
 \newcommand{\VW}{Visvalingam--Whyatt}
+\newcommand{\WM}{Wang--M{\"u}ller}
 
 \title{
     Cartografic Generalization of Lines \\
@@ -183,7 +184,14 @@ retained.
 \end{figure}
 
 \section{Suggested alternative}
-\label{sec:my_idea}
+\label{sec:suggested_alternative}
+
+TODO:
+\begin{itemize}
+    \item Describe algorithm by {\WM}.
+    \item Explain how outputs will differ.
+    \item Explain implementation plan?
+\end{itemize}
 
 \section{Related Work and future suggestions}
 \label{sec:related_work}
@@ -201,6 +209,11 @@ between line simplification algorithms could be more objective.
 \section{Conclusions and Further Work}
 \label{sec:conclusions_and_further_work}
 
+We have practically evaluated two readily available line simplification
+algorithms with a river sample: {\VW} and {\DP}, and outlined their
+deficiencies. We are suggesting to implement {\WM} and compare it to the other
+two.
+
 \printbibliography
 
 \end{document}