booker's wording

This commit is contained in:
Motiejus Jakštys 2020-05-27 09:27:52 +03:00
parent 7f7eeac144
commit a06c884cb1

View File

@ -125,17 +125,15 @@ During research for the mentioned articles, prototype code has been written for
most of the algorithms. However, none of them seem to be available for use
except for the two "classical" ones -- {\DP} and {\VW}.
\cite{wang1998line} is available in a commercial product, which seems the only
algorithm specifically created for cartographic generalization and available
for general use. This poses a significant problem for map creation: without a
good simplification algorithm, every down-scaled map, of which creator did not
acquire a license for the said product will be of sub-par quality. The more
barriers there are for creating maps in open-source software, the less
open-source will fit the needs of the public, leading to even smaller
open-source applicability and community. We believe that availability of
high-quality open-source tools benefits the society as a whole, as opposed to a
single company producing the said tools, therefore we think it's worth
investing the effort into creating open algorithm implementations.
\cite{wang1998line} is an algorithm specifically created for cartographic
generalization and available for general use, though it is only currently
available in a commercial product. This poses a problem for map creation in
open source software: there is not a similar high-quality simplification
algorithm to create down-scaled maps, so any cartographic work, which uses line
generalization as part of its processing, will be of sub-par quality.
We believe that availability of high-quality open-source tools is an important
foundation for future cartographic experimentation and development, thus it
it benefits the cartographic society as a whole.
This paper will be reviewing and comparing two widely available algorithms that
are often used for line generalization: