more sources
This commit is contained in:
@@ -34,14 +34,25 @@
|
||||
Ready-to-use, open-source line generalization solutions emit poor cartographic
|
||||
output. Therefore, if one is using open-source technology to create a
|
||||
large-scale map, downscaled lines (e.g. rivers) will look poorly. This paper
|
||||
explores line generalization algorithms and suggests to implement an algorithm
|
||||
for an avid GIS developer. Once the algorithm is implemented and integrated to
|
||||
open-source GIS solutions (e.g. QGIS), rivers on future large-scale maps will
|
||||
look professionally downscaled.
|
||||
explores line generalization algorithms and suggests one for an avid GIS
|
||||
developer to implement. Once it is implemented and integrated to open-source
|
||||
GIS solutions (e.g. QGIS), rivers on future large-scale maps will look
|
||||
professionally downscaled.
|
||||
|
||||
\section{Introduction}
|
||||
\label{sec:introduction}
|
||||
|
||||
Cartographic generalization is one of the key processes of creating large-scale
|
||||
maps: how can one approximate object features, without losing its main
|
||||
cartographic properties?
|
||||
|
||||
Linear generalization algorithms are well studied, tested and implemented.
|
||||
|
||||
There are two main approaches to generalize lines in a map: geometric and
|
||||
cartographic.
|
||||
|
||||
\subsection{
|
||||
|
||||
\section{The Problem}
|
||||
\label{sec:the_problem}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user