two sinewave variants

II/Referatas/fig2layer.py

@@ -19,11 +19,18 @@ def write_file(args, geom):
 
 def sinewave(args):
     INTERVAL = 0.1
-    TAIL_LEN = 7
+
-    SINE_LEN = 7
+    if args.numwaves == 2:
-    TAILS = np.zeros(int(TAIL_LEN / INTERVAL))
+        TAIL_LEN, SINE_LEN = 7, 7
-    sin_range = np.arange(-pi/4, SINE_LEN, INTERVAL)
+        TAILS = np.zeros(int(TAIL_LEN / INTERVAL))
-    amplitude = (np.sin(sin_range * pi / 2) + 1)*2
+        sin_range = np.arange(-pi/4, SINE_LEN, INTERVAL) * pi / 2
+        amplitude = (np.sin(sin_range)+1)*2
+    else:
+        TAIL_LEN, SINE_LEN = 3.5, 3.5
+        TAILS = np.zeros(int(TAIL_LEN / INTERVAL))
+        sin_range = np.arange(-pi/4, SINE_LEN - pi/8, INTERVAL) * pi / 2
+        amplitude = np.sin(sin_range) + 1
+
     y = np.concatenate([TAILS, amplitude, TAILS])
     x = np.arange(-TAIL_LEN - pi/4, SINE_LEN + TAIL_LEN, INTERVAL)
     lines = LineString(zip(x*10, y*10))
@@ -47,6 +54,7 @@ def parse_args():
     parser.add_argument('-o', '--outfile', metavar='<file>', required=True)
     subparsers = parser.add_subparsers()
     sine = subparsers.add_parser('sine', help='Sine wave')
+    sine.add_argument('--numwaves', choices=[1, 2], type=int, help='Number of waves')
     sine.set_defaults(func=sinewave)
     rect = subparsers.add_parser('rect', help='Rectangle')
     rect.add_argument('--bounds', type=float, nargs=4, metavar=BOUNDS)

II/Referatas/mj-referatas.tex

@@ -239,7 +239,8 @@ Let's zoom in to the river crossing area for some of the algorithms; see
 table~\ref{tab:comparison-crossing} on page~\pageref{tab:comparison-crossing}.
 
 Both {\VW} and {\DP} simplify "blunt" bends (a "blunt" bent looks like a cutout
-from a large circle, see figure~\ref{blunt-bent} on page~\pageref{blunt-bent}.
+from a large circle, see figure~\ref{fig:blunt-bent} on
+page~\pageref{fig:blunt-bent}.
 
 \begin{figure}[h]
     \centering
@@ -287,18 +288,18 @@ of the least developed aspects of automatic line generalization, according to
 \cite{miuller1995generalization}. {\WM} encoded this process to an algorithm.
 
 Imagine there are two small bends close to each other, similar to
-figure~\ref{pic:sinewave} on page~\pageref{pic:sinewave}, and one needs
+figure~\ref{fig:sinewave} on page~\pageref{fig:sinewave}, and one needs to
-to generalize it. The bends are too large to ignore replace them with a
+generalize it. The bends are too large to ignore replace them with a straight
-straight line, but too small to retain both and retain their complexity.
+line, but too small to retain both and retain their complexity.
 
 \begin{figure}[h]
     \centering
     \includegraphics[width=52mm]{sinewave}
     \caption{Example river bend that should be generalized}
-    \label{pic:sinewave}
+    \label{fig:sinewave}
 \end{figure}
 
-When one applies {\DP} to figure~\ref{pic:sinewave}, either both bends remain,
+When one applies {\DP} to figure~\ref{fig:sinewave}, either both bends remain,
 or become a straight line, see table~\ref{tab:comparison-sinewave} on
 page~\pageref{tab:comparison-sinewave}.
 
@@ -330,6 +331,9 @@ page~\pageref{tab:comparison-sinewave}.
     \label{tab:comparison-sinewave}
 \end{figure}
 
+Ideally, the double-bend in figure~\ref{fig:sinewave} should be normalized to a
+larger single-bend, similar to figure~ on page~.
+
 \section{Related Work and future suggestions}
 \label{sec:related_work}