From bfaded4a57595e8931e133e52aadca20e3c54ebe Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Motiejus=20Jak=C5=A1tys?= Date: Tue, 18 May 2021 13:56:43 +0300 Subject: [PATCH] more labels, less captions --- IV/Makefile | 8 +++-- IV/mj-msc.tex | 91 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------------- 2 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-) diff --git a/IV/Makefile b/IV/Makefile index ccbdab3..d38cec3 100644 --- a/IV/Makefile +++ b/IV/Makefile @@ -153,9 +153,11 @@ RIVERS += salvis-$(1)-$(2)-$(3)-1x50k$(4) salvis-$(1)-$(2)-$(3)-1x50k$(4)_1SELECT = wm_visuals where name='salvis-$(1)' salvis-$(1)-$(2)-$(3)-1x50k$(4)_1COLOR = orange salvis-$(1)-$(2)-$(3)-1x50k$(4)_1LABEL = $(label_$(1)) +$(if $(2), salvis-$(1)-$(2)-$(3)-1x50k$(4)_2SELECT = wm_visuals where name='salvis-$(2)' salvis-$(1)-$(2)-$(3)-1x50k$(4)_2COLOR = green salvis-$(1)-$(2)-$(3)-1x50k$(4)_2LABEL = $(label_$(2)) +,) $(if $(3), salvis-$(1)-$(2)-$(3)-1x50k$(4)_3SELECT = wm_visuals where name='salvis-$(3)' salvis-$(1)-$(2)-$(3)-1x50k$(4)_3LINESTYLE = dotted @@ -172,9 +174,9 @@ $(foreach x,vw64 dp64 vwchaikin64 dpchaikin64,\ $(eval $(call wm_vwdp50k,wm75,grpk50,grpk10)) $(eval $(call wm_vwdp50k,wm75,grpk50,grpk10,tr)) -$(eval $(call wm_vwdp50k,wm75,grpk10,,)) -$(eval $(call wm_vwdp50k,wm75,grpk10,,tr)) -$(eval $(call wm_vwdp50k,wm75,grpk10,,tl)) +$(eval $(call wm_vwdp50k,wm75,,grpk10,)) +$(eval $(call wm_vwdp50k,wm75,,grpk10,tr)) +$(eval $(call wm_vwdp50k,wm75,,grpk10,tl)) salvis-25k_1SELECT = wm_visuals where name='salvis-grpk10' salvis-25k_WIDTHDIV = 1 diff --git a/IV/mj-msc.tex b/IV/mj-msc.tex index e5dfeb8..14ab070 100644 --- a/IV/mj-msc.tex +++ b/IV/mj-msc.tex @@ -1394,38 +1394,38 @@ Our generalized results are viewed from the following angles: \begin{figure}[h!] \centering - \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{salvis-wm75-grpk10--1x50k} + \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{salvis-wm75--grpk10-1x50k} \caption{2x zoomed-in {\WM} for 1:\numprint{50000}.} - \label{fig:salvis-wm75-grpk10--1x50k} + \label{fig:salvis-wm75--grpk10-1x50k} \end{figure} -As one can see in Figure~\ref{fig:salvis-wm75-grpk10--1x50k}, the illustrations deliver +\begin{figure}[h!] + \centering + \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{salvis-wm75--grpk10-1x50ktl} + \caption{Left part of Figure~\ref{fig:salvis-wm75--grpk10-1x50k}.} + \label{fig:salvis-wm75--grpk10-1x50ktl} +\end{figure} + +\begin{figure}[h!] + \centering + \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{salvis-wm75--grpk10-1x50ktr} + \caption{Top--right part of Figure~\ref{fig:salvis-wm75--grpk10-1x50k}.} + \label{fig:salvis-wm75--grpk10-1x50ktr} +\end{figure} + +As one can see in Figure~\ref{fig:salvis-wm75--grpk10-1x50k}, the illustrations deliver what was promised by the algorithm, but with a few caveats. Left side of the figure looks reasonably well simplified: long bends remain slightly curved, small bends are removed or slightly exaggerated. -Figure's~\ref{fig:salvis-wm75-grpk10--1x50k} left part is clipped to -Figure~\ref{fig:salvis-wm75-grpk10--1x50ktl}. As one can see, some bends were well +Figure's~\ref{fig:salvis-wm75--grpk10-1x50k} left part is clipped to +Figure~\ref{fig:salvis-wm75--grpk10-1x50ktl}. As one can see, some bends were well exaggerated, and some bends were eliminated. -\begin{figure}[h!] - \centering - \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{salvis-wm75-grpk10--1x50ktl} - \caption{Left part of Figure~\ref{fig:salvis-wm75-grpk10--1x50k}.} - \label{fig:salvis-wm75-grpk10--1x50ktl} -\end{figure} - -Top--right side (clipped in Figure~\ref{fig:salvis-wm75-grpk10--1x50ktl}) some jagged +Top--right side (clipped in Figure~\ref{fig:salvis-wm75--grpk10-1x50ktl}) some jagged and sharp bends appear. These will become more pronounced in even larger-scale simplification in the next section. -\begin{figure}[h!] - \centering - \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{salvis-wm75-grpk10--1x50ktr} - \caption{Top--right part of Figure~\ref{fig:salvis-wm75-grpk10--1x50k}.} - \label{fig:salvis-wm75-grpk10--1x50ktr} -\end{figure} - To sum up, mid-scale simplification works well for some geometries, but creates sharp edges for others. @@ -1487,8 +1487,8 @@ future research and improvement: \subsubsection{Background} -There are a few datasets used in this comparison: GDB10LT, grpk50LT and -grpk250LT. They are vector datasets, which include rivers. They can be +There are a few datasets used in this comparison: GDB10LT, GRPK50 and +GRPK250. They are vector datasets, which include rivers. They can be downloaded for free from \cite{nzt}. Here are the meanings of the codenames: \begin{description} @@ -1496,9 +1496,9 @@ downloaded for free from \cite{nzt}. Here are the meanings of the codenames: \item[GDB10LT] is dataset of highest detail. Suited for maps of scale 1:\numprint{10000}. - \item[grpk50LT] is suited for maps of scale 1:\numprint{50000}. + \item[GRPK50] is suited for maps of scale 1:\numprint{50000}. - \item[grpk250LT] offers least detail, and is suited for maps of + \item[GRPK250] offers least detail, and is suited for maps of scale 1:\numprint{250000}. \end{description} @@ -1506,41 +1506,42 @@ downloaded for free from \cite{nzt}. Here are the meanings of the codenames: During the analysis, we ran {\WM} on GDB10LT for 2 destination scales: 1:\numprint{50000} and 1:\numprint{250000}.\footnote{parameter calculation is detailed in section~\ref{sec:bend-scaling-and-dimensions}.} This section -compares the resulting {\WM}--generalized rivers to grpk50LT and grpk250LT. +compares the resulting {\WM}--generalized rivers to GRPK50 and GRPK250. \subsubsection{Medium-scale (1:\numprint{50000})} For our research location, the national dataset GDB10LT is almost equivalent to -grpk50LT, with a few nuances. Figure~\ref{fig:salvis-wm75-grpk50-grpk10} illustrates -all three shapes: grpk50LT, {\WM}--simplified GDB10LT, and the original GDB10LT. +GRPK50, with a few nuances. Figure~\ref{fig:salvis-wm75-grpk50-grpk10-1x50k} +illustrates all three shapes: GRPK50, {\WM}--simplified GDB10LT, and the +original GDB10LT. \begin{figure}[h!] \centering - \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{salvis-wm75-grpk50-grpk10} + \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{salvis-wm75-grpk50-grpk10-1x50k} - \caption{2x zoomed-in grpk50LT (green), {\WM}--simplified GDB10LT (orange) - and original GDB10LT (dotted black).} + \caption{GRPK10, GRPK50 and {\WM} for 1:\numprint{50000}.} - \label{fig:salvis-wm75-grpk50-grpk10} + \label{fig:salvis-wm75-grpk50-grpk10-1x50k} \end{figure} \begin{figure}[h!] \centering \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{salvis-wm75-grpk50-grpk10-1x50ktr} - \caption{Top--right side of Figure~\ref{fig:salvis-wm75-grpk50-grpk10}.} + \caption{Top--right side of Figure~\ref{fig:salvis-wm75-grpk50-grpk10-1x50k}.} \label{fig:salvis-wm75-grpk50-grpk10-1x50ktr} \end{figure} -Although figures are almost identical, Figure~\ref{fig:salvis-wm75-grpk50-grpk10-1x50ktr} -illustrates two small bends that have been removed in grpk50LT, but have been -exaggerated by our implementation. +Although figures are almost identical, +Figure~\ref{fig:salvis-wm75-grpk50-grpk10-1x50ktr} illustrates two small bends +that have been removed in GRPK50, but have been exaggerated by our +implementation. \subsubsection{Large-scale (1:\numprint{250000})} \label{sec:national-large-scale} -Figure~\ref{fig:salvis-wm220} illustrates the original grpk250LT and the +Figure~\ref{fig:salvis-wm220} illustrates the original GRPK250 and the {\WM}--simplified version. As section~\ref{sec:analyzed-large-scale} explains, -the algorithm tries to exaggerate many bends to a great size. However, grpk250LT +the algorithm tries to exaggerate many bends to a great size. However, GRPK250 takes the opposite approach --- only the very basic shapes of the largest bends are retained. Time and customers will tell, which approach is more appropriate, after the current {\WM} implementation receives some time and attention, as @@ -1550,7 +1551,7 @@ desired in section~\ref{sec:future-suggestions}. \centering \begin{subfigure}[b]{.49\textwidth} \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{salvis-grpk250-2x} - \caption{grpk250LT.} + \caption{GRPK250.} \end{subfigure} \hfill \begin{subfigure}[b]{.49\textwidth} @@ -1558,7 +1559,7 @@ desired in section~\ref{sec:future-suggestions}. \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{salvis-wm220} \caption{{\WM}-simplified GDB10LT.} \end{subfigure} - \caption{grpk250LT and {\WM}--simplified GDB10LT.} + \caption{GRPK250 and {\WM}--simplified GDB10LT.} \label{fig:salvis-wm220} \end{figure} @@ -1574,18 +1575,12 @@ in this section to 1:\numprint{50000}. \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{salvis-wm75-dp64-grpk10-1x50k} - \caption{{\DP} (green), {\WM} (orange) and original (black dotted) at - 1:\numprint{50000}.} - \label{fig:salvis-wm75-dp64-grpk10-1x50k} \end{figure} \begin{figure}[h!] \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{salvis-wm75-dpchaikin64-grpk10-1x50k} - \caption{Chaikin--smoothened {\DP} (green), {\WM} (orange) and original - (black dotted) at 1:\numprint{50000}.} - \label{fig:salvis-wm75-dpchaikin64-grpk10-1x50k} \end{figure} @@ -1593,18 +1588,12 @@ in this section to 1:\numprint{50000}. \begin{figure}[h!] \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{salvis-wm75-vw64-grpk10-1x50k} - \caption{{\VW} (green), {\WM} (orange) and original (black dotted) at - 1:\numprint{50000}.} - \label{fig:salvis-wm75-vw64-grpk10-1x50k} \end{figure} \begin{figure}[h!] \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{salvis-wm75-vwchaikin64-grpk10-1x50k} - \caption{Chaikin--smoothened {\VW} (green), {\WM} (orange) and original - (black dotted) at 1:\numprint{50000}.} - \label{fig:salvis-wm75-vwchaikin64-grpk10-1x50k} \end{figure}