From dc2e38365c469728e9938b9491655ce981421190 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Motiejus=20Jak=C5=A1tys?= Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2021 04:49:27 +0300 Subject: [PATCH] use article --- IV/mj-msc.tex | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------- 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-) diff --git a/IV/mj-msc.tex b/IV/mj-msc.tex index b8f71a5..c9250c5 100644 --- a/IV/mj-msc.tex +++ b/IV/mj-msc.tex @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -\documentclass[a4paper]{report} +\documentclass[a4paper]{article} \usepackage[T1]{fontenc} %\usepackage[bitstream-charter]{mathdesign} @@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ Current open-source line generalization solutions have their roots in \newpage -\chapter{Introduction} +\section{Introduction} \label{sec:introduction} When creating small-scale maps, often the detail of the data source is greater @@ -118,13 +118,13 @@ Given the discussed complexities, a fine line between under-generalization found. Therein lies the complexity of generalization algorithms: all have different trade-offs. -\chapter{Literature review} +\section{Literature review} \label{sec:literature-review} A number of cartographic line generalization algorithms have been researched. The "classical" ones are {\DP} and {\VW}. -\section{{\DP} and {\VW}} +\subsection{{\DP} and {\VW}} \cite{douglas1973algorithms} and \cite{visvalingam1993line} are "classical" line generalization computer graphics algorithms. They are relatively simple to @@ -152,7 +152,7 @@ generalization. -\section{Modern approaches} +\subsection{Modern approaches} Due to their simplicity and ubiquity, {\DP} and {\VW} have been established as go-to algorithms for line generalization. During recent years, alternatives @@ -181,7 +181,7 @@ open-source tools is an important foundation for future cartographic experimentation and development, thus it it benefits the cartographic society as a whole. -\chapter{Methodology} +\section{Methodology} \label{sec:methodology} The original \cite{wang1998line} leaves something to be desired for a practical @@ -199,7 +199,7 @@ every step of the algorithm. Algorithms discussed in this paper assume Euclidean geometry. -\section{Vocabulary and terminology} +\subsection{Vocabulary and terminology} This section defines vocabulary and terms as defined in the rest of the paper. @@ -227,7 +227,7 @@ This section defines vocabulary and terms as defined in the rest of the paper. \end{description} -\section{Automated tests} +\subsection{Automated tests} \label{sec:automated-tests} As part of the algorithm realization, an automated test suite has been @@ -251,7 +251,7 @@ The full test suite can be executed with a single command, and completes in a few seconds. Having an easily accessible test suite boosts confidence that no unexpected bugs have snug in while modifying the algorithm. -\chapter{Description of the implementation} +\section{Description of the implementation} Like alluded in section~\onpage{sec:introduction}, \cite{wang1998line} paper skims over certain details, which are important to implement the algorithm. @@ -271,7 +271,7 @@ purposes) using the following algorithm: \item Color the polygons using distinct colors. \end{itemize} -\section{Definition of a Bend} +\subsection{Definition of a Bend} \label{sec:definition-of-a-bend} The original article describes a bend as: @@ -310,7 +310,7 @@ but with bends colored as polygons: each color is a distinctive bend. \label{fig:fig8-definition-of-a-bend} \end{figure} -\section{Gentle Inflection at End of a Bend} +\subsection{Gentle Inflection at End of a Bend} The gist of the section is in the original article: @@ -378,41 +378,40 @@ some bends that should be mutated. This implementation does it in the following The current implementation is the most straightforward, but not optimal: reversing of lines and bends could be avoided by walking backwards the lines. -In this case, steps \ref{rev1} and \ref{rev2} could be remove. That would save -both memory and computation time. +In this case, steps \ref{rev1} and \ref{rev2} could be spared, thus saving +memory and computation time. -The "quite small angle", as mentioned in the article, was arbitrarily chosen to -$\smallAngle$. +The "quite small angle" was arbitrarily chosen to $\smallAngle$. -\section{Self-line Crossing When Cutting a Bend} +\subsection{Self-line Crossing When Cutting a Bend} -\section{Attributes of a Single Bend} +\subsection{Attributes of a Single Bend} -\section{Shape of a Bend} +\subsection{Shape of a Bend} -\section{The Context of a Bend: Isolated and Similar Bends} +\subsection{The Context of a Bend: Isolated and Similar Bends} -\section{Elimination Operator} +\subsection{Elimination Operator} -\section{Combination Operator} +\subsection{Combination Operator} -\section{Exaggeration Operator} +\subsection{Exaggeration Operator} -\chapter{Program Implementation} +\section{Program Implementation} -\chapter{Results of Experiments} +\section{Results of Experiments} -\chapter{Conclusions} +\section{Conclusions} \label{sec:conclusions} -\chapter{Related Work and future suggestions} +\section{Related Work and future suggestions} \label{sec:related_work} \printbibliography \begin{appendices} -\chapter{Code listings} +\section{Code listings} We strongly believe in the ability to reproduce the results is critical for any scientific work. To make it possible for this paper, all source files and