From 8bfc582d6e8908a3c3dbc010eab604d6c5eb41e3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Motiejus=20Jak=C5=A1tys?= Date: Wed, 19 May 2021 23:13:59 +0300 Subject: [PATCH] remove notes.txt --- notes.txt | 117 ------------------------------------------------------ 1 file changed, 117 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 notes.txt diff --git a/notes.txt b/notes.txt deleted file mode 100644 index d7aa55b..0000000 --- a/notes.txt +++ /dev/null @@ -1,117 +0,0 @@ -Self-line crossing when cutting a bend --------------------------------------- - -The self-line-crossing may happen after a few bends have been skipped. E.g. -ends of A<->B cross the line, but "swallow" a few more in between: - - ,______ - / \ - |___A | \ \ - \ | B\ | __ - \ | | | / \ - / | | |___,---,___/A | - / | \_________________| - \ | - \ | \ \ - / / B\ | _ __ - ----/ / | | / \ / \ - / ,____/ | |___/ \___/A | - / B| \_________________| - | - - - -If a bend with 180+ deg sum of inflection angles is found, its line between -inflection angles (AB in our examples) must be crossed with all the other bends -to detect a possible line-crossing. This is O(N*M), where N is the total number -of line segments, and M is the number of qualifying bends. It is expensive. - -Also, there is another way to remove self-crossing, without removing most of -the bend. E.g. from: - - \ / - B\ | __ - | | / \ - | |____/A | - \__________| - -Instead of: - - \ / - \/ A' - B - -To: - - \ \_ - B\ `-,_.__ - | A' \ - | | - \__________| - -But perhaps it doesn't look quite as natural. I will trust the original -article to do the right thing here and remove the bend altogether. - -ALSO: the bends should be iterated from different directions: - -for i := 0; i < len(bends); i++ { - for j := 0; j < i; j++ { - ... - } - for j := len(bends); j > i; j-- { - ... - } -} - -So if there are multiple bends between the baseline, they will be cut -correctly. - -The Context of a Bend ---------------------- - -Similar bends: - -> For example, if bend 1 has four unit areas and bend 2 has six unit areas, the -> average size is five units, and the normalized areas of bends 1 and 2 are -> 4/5=0.8 and 6/5=1.2, respectively. - -My comment: everything until this sentence is clear. However, "unit areas" is -misleading: there is little reason to normalize areas, but leave the distances -intact (if we'd like to normalize areas, it would make sense to square-root -them). - -Removing that removes changes the meaning of the sentence that **euclidean -distance** is normalized (the composite of the bend properties), rather than -a single component. - -Offered structure ------------------ - -- Introduction -- Previous research overview -- Methodology and methodics -- Results -- Conclusions -- Literature review -- Appendix - -for 2021-04-19 --------------- - -- literatūros šaltinių analizė -- literatūros šaltinių priskyrimas atskiroms magistro darbo struktūrinėms dalims - -analizės uždaviniai: -- galutinis problemos formulavimas -- darbo tikslo formulavimas -- uždavinių formulavimas -- aktualumo -- naujumo -- pritaikomumo formulavimas - -Angl.: - -- trūksta literatūros apžvalgos: pervadinti šiuolaikinius sprendimus į tai -- mažiausiai 2 poskyriai skyriuje. -- techninė dalis -- į rezultatus. -- "eksperimento rezultatai" eina į "darbo rezultatus".