From e61e75e3ac07cc79020e34a0205d4436b16d5c11 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Motiejus=20Jak=C5=A1tys?= <motiejus@jakstys.lt>
Date: Wed, 19 May 2021 22:57:51 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] final section has been written

---
 Makefile   | 25 ++++++++++++++++++-------
 mj-msc.tex | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 2 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
index 93aa854..8c29330 100644
--- a/Makefile
+++ b/Makefile
@@ -33,20 +33,23 @@ FIGURES = \
 RIVERS = \
 		 salvis-25k \
 		 salvis-50k \
-		 salvis-250k \
+		 salvis-250k-10x \
+		 salvis-gdr250-2x \
 		 salvis-douglas-64-50k \
 		 salvis-visvalingam-64-50k \
 		 salvis-douglas-64-chaikin-50k \
 		 salvis-visvalingam-64-chaikin-50k \
 		 salvis-overlaid-douglas-64-chaikin-50k \
 		 salvis-overlaid-visvalingam-64-chaikin-50k \
-		 salvis-wm-250k \
+		 salvis-wm-250k-10x \
+		 salvis-wm-250k-2x \
 		 salvis-wm-50k \
 		 salvis-wm-50k-nw \
 		 salvis-wm-50k-ne \
 		 salvis-wm-overlaid-250k-zoom \
 		 salvis-wm-gdr50 \
-		 salvis-wm-gdr50-ne
+		 salvis-wm-gdr50-ne \
+		 salvis-wm-220
 
 #################################
 # The thesis, publishable version
@@ -174,8 +177,11 @@ salvis-25k_WIDTHDIV = 1
 salvis-50k_1SELECT = wm_visuals where name='salvis'
 salvis-50k_WIDTHDIV = 2
 
-salvis-250k_1SELECT = wm_visuals where name='salvis'
-salvis-250k_WIDTHDIV = 10
+salvis-250k-10x_1SELECT = wm_visuals where name='salvis'
+salvis-250k-10x_WIDTHDIV = 10
+
+salvis-gdr250-2x_1SELECT = wm_visuals where name='salvis-gdr250'
+salvis-gdr250-2x_WIDTHDIV = 2
 
 salvis-douglas-64-50k_1SELECT = wm_visuals where name='salvis-douglas-64'
 salvis-douglas-64-50k_WIDTHDIV = 2
@@ -201,8 +207,11 @@ salvis-overlaid-visvalingam-64-chaikin-50k_1COLOR = orange
 salvis-overlaid-visvalingam-64-chaikin-50k_WIDTHDIV = 2
 salvis-overlaid-visvalingam-64-chaikin-50k_QUADRANT = 1
 
-salvis-wm-250k_1SELECT = wm_visuals where name='salvis-wm-220'
-salvis-wm-250k_WIDTHDIV = 10
+salvis-wm-250k-2x_1SELECT = wm_visuals where name='salvis-wm-220'
+salvis-wm-250k-2x_WIDTHDIV = 2
+
+salvis-wm-250k-10x_1SELECT = wm_visuals where name='salvis-wm-220'
+salvis-wm-250k-10x_WIDTHDIV = 10
 
 salvis-wm-50k_1SELECT = wm_visuals where name='salvis-wm-75'
 salvis-wm-50k_2SELECT = wm_visuals where name='salvis'
@@ -235,6 +244,8 @@ salvis-wm-gdr50-ne_1COLOR = orange
 salvis-wm-gdr50-ne_2COLOR = green
 salvis-wm-gdr50-ne_QUADRANT = 1
 
+salvis-wm-220_1SELECT = wm_visuals where name='salvis-wm-220'
+salvis-wm-220_WIDTHDIV = 2
 
 .faux_db_pre: db init.sql
 	bash db start
diff --git a/mj-msc.tex b/mj-msc.tex
index 63dbcc2..13af5e4 100644
--- a/mj-msc.tex
+++ b/mj-msc.tex
@@ -254,7 +254,7 @@ simplification.
     \hfill
     \begin{subfigure}[b]{.49\textwidth}
         \centering
-        \includegraphics[width=.2\textwidth]{salvis-250k}
+        \includegraphics[width=.2\textwidth]{salvis-250k-10x}
         \caption{Example scaled 1:\numprint{250000}.}
     \end{subfigure}
     \caption{Down-scaled original river.}
@@ -1416,6 +1416,7 @@ To sum up, mid-scale simplification works well for some geometries, but creates
 sharp edges for others.
 
 \subsubsection{Large-scale (1:\numprint{250000})}
+\label{sec:analyzed-large-scale}
 
 As visible in figure~\ref{fig:salvis-wm-250k}, for large-scale map, some of the
 resulting bends look significantly exaggerated. Why is that?
@@ -1426,7 +1427,7 @@ simplification and overlays the original.
     \centering
     \begin{subfigure}[b]{.49\textwidth}
         \centering
-        \includegraphics[width=.2\textwidth]{salvis-250k}
+        \includegraphics[width=.2\textwidth]{salvis-250k-10x}
         \caption{Original.}
     \end{subfigure}
     \hfill
@@ -1521,6 +1522,32 @@ illustrates two small bends that have been removed in GDR50LT, but have been
 exaggerated by our implementation.
 
 \subsubsection{Large-scale (1:\numprint{250000})}
+\label{sec:national-large-scale}
+
+Figure~\ref{fig:salvis-wm-250k} illustrates the original GDR250LT and the
+{\WM}--simplified version. As section~\ref{sec:analyzed-large-scale} explains,
+the algorithm tries to exaggerate many bends to a great size. However, GDR250LT
+takes the opposite approach --- only the very basic shapes of the largest bends
+are retained. Time and customers will tell, which approach is more appropriate,
+after the current {\WM} implementation receives some time and attention, as
+desired in section~\ref{sec:future-suggestions}.
+
+\begin{figure}[h!]
+    \centering
+    \begin{subfigure}[b]{.49\textwidth}
+        \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{salvis-gdr250-2x}
+        \caption{GDR250LT.}
+    \end{subfigure}
+    \hfill
+    \begin{subfigure}[b]{.49\textwidth}
+        \centering
+        \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{salvis-wm-220}
+        \caption{{\WM}-simplified GDB10LT.}
+    \end{subfigure}
+    \caption{GDR250LT and {\WM}--simplified GDB10LT.}
+    \label{fig:salvis-wm-250k}
+\end{figure}
+
 
 \subsection{Testing Results Online}
 \label{sec:testing-results-online}
@@ -1578,6 +1605,10 @@ implementation:
         Section~\ref{sec:generalization-results-of-analyzed-rivers} contains
         a exaggerated bends that became sharp and includes some future ideas.
 
+    \item What are the exaggeration limits when working with large scales?
+        Section~\ref{sec:national-large-scales} discusses examples that some
+        limits are necessary.
+
     \item Research when bends should be marked as \textsc{isolated}. As is
         seen from examples, the current criteria is not robust enough.