codegen: fix taking the address of a zero-bit field in a zero-bit struct
Normally when we want a pointer to the end of a struct we just add 1 to the struct pointer. However, when it is a zero-bit struct, the pointer type being used during lowering is often a dummy pointer type that actually points to a non-zero-bit type, so we actually want to add 0 instead, since a zero-bit struct begins and ends at the same address.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1365,7 +1365,7 @@ test "fieldParentPtr of a zero-bit field" {
|
||||
if (builtin.zig_backend == .stage2_arm) return error.SkipZigTest; // TODO
|
||||
|
||||
const S = struct {
|
||||
fn testOneType(comptime A: type) !void {
|
||||
fn testStruct(comptime A: type) !void {
|
||||
{
|
||||
const a = A{ .u = 0 };
|
||||
const b_ptr = &a.b;
|
||||
@@ -1379,9 +1379,29 @@ test "fieldParentPtr of a zero-bit field" {
|
||||
try std.testing.expectEqual(&a, a_ptr);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
fn testNestedStruct(comptime A: type) !void {
|
||||
{
|
||||
const a = A{ .u = 0 };
|
||||
const c_ptr = &a.b.c;
|
||||
const b_ptr = @fieldParentPtr(@TypeOf(a.b), "c", c_ptr);
|
||||
try std.testing.expectEqual(&a.b, b_ptr);
|
||||
const a_ptr = @fieldParentPtr(A, "b", b_ptr);
|
||||
try std.testing.expectEqual(&a, a_ptr);
|
||||
}
|
||||
{
|
||||
var a = A{ .u = 0 };
|
||||
const c_ptr = &a.b.c;
|
||||
const b_ptr = @fieldParentPtr(@TypeOf(a.b), "c", c_ptr);
|
||||
try std.testing.expectEqual(&a.b, b_ptr);
|
||||
const a_ptr = @fieldParentPtr(A, "b", b_ptr);
|
||||
try std.testing.expectEqual(&a, a_ptr);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
fn doTheTest() !void {
|
||||
try testOneType(struct { b: void = {}, u: u8 });
|
||||
try testOneType(struct { u: u8, b: void = {} });
|
||||
try testStruct(struct { b: void = {}, u: u8 });
|
||||
try testStruct(struct { u: u8, b: void = {} });
|
||||
try testNestedStruct(struct { b: struct { c: void = {} } = .{}, u: u8 });
|
||||
try testNestedStruct(struct { u: u8, b: struct { c: void = {} } = .{} });
|
||||
}
|
||||
};
|
||||
try S.doTheTest();
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user