allow empty function and return with no expression
This commit is contained in:
@@ -80,9 +80,14 @@ struct TypeNode {
|
||||
TypeTableEntry *entry;
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
struct FnDefNode {
|
||||
bool add_implicit_return;
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
struct CodeGenNode {
|
||||
union {
|
||||
TypeNode type_node; // for NodeTypeType
|
||||
FnDefNode fn_def_node; // for NodeTypeFnDef
|
||||
} data;
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -275,6 +280,60 @@ static void find_declarations(CodeGen *g, AstNode *node) {
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void check_fn_def_control_flow(CodeGen *g, AstNode *node) {
|
||||
// Follow the execution flow and make sure the code returns appropriately.
|
||||
// * A `return` statement in an unreachable type function should be an error.
|
||||
// * Control flow should not be able to reach the end of an unreachable type function.
|
||||
// * Functions that have a type other than void should not return without a value.
|
||||
// * void functions without explicit return statements at the end need the
|
||||
// add_implicit_return flag set on the codegen node.
|
||||
assert(node->type == NodeTypeFnDef);
|
||||
AstNode *proto_node = node->data.fn_def.fn_proto;
|
||||
assert(proto_node->type == NodeTypeFnProto);
|
||||
AstNode *return_type_node = proto_node->data.fn_proto.return_type;
|
||||
assert(return_type_node->type == NodeTypeType);
|
||||
|
||||
node->codegen_node = allocate<CodeGenNode>(1);
|
||||
FnDefNode *codegen_fn_def = &node->codegen_node->data.fn_def_node;
|
||||
|
||||
assert(return_type_node->codegen_node);
|
||||
TypeTableEntry *type_entry = return_type_node->codegen_node->data.type_node.entry;
|
||||
assert(type_entry);
|
||||
TypeId type_id = type_entry->id;
|
||||
|
||||
AstNode *body_node = node->data.fn_def.body;
|
||||
assert(body_node->type == NodeTypeBlock);
|
||||
|
||||
// TODO once we understand types, do this pass after type checking, and
|
||||
// if an expression has an unreachable value then stop looking at statements after
|
||||
// it. then we can remove the check to `unreachable` in the end of this function.
|
||||
bool prev_statement_return = false;
|
||||
for (int i = 0; i < body_node->data.block.statements.length; i += 1) {
|
||||
AstNode *statement_node = body_node->data.block.statements.at(i);
|
||||
if (statement_node->type == NodeTypeStatementReturn) {
|
||||
if (type_id == TypeIdUnreachable) {
|
||||
add_node_error(g, statement_node,
|
||||
buf_sprintf("return statement in function with unreachable return type"));
|
||||
return;
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
prev_statement_return = true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else if (prev_statement_return) {
|
||||
add_node_error(g, statement_node,
|
||||
buf_sprintf("unreachable code"));
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (!prev_statement_return) {
|
||||
if (type_id == TypeIdVoid) {
|
||||
codegen_fn_def->add_implicit_return = true;
|
||||
} else if (type_id != TypeIdUnreachable) {
|
||||
add_node_error(g, node,
|
||||
buf_sprintf("control reaches end of non-void function"));
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void analyze_node(CodeGen *g, AstNode *node) {
|
||||
switch (node->type) {
|
||||
case NodeTypeRoot:
|
||||
@@ -299,6 +358,8 @@ static void analyze_node(CodeGen *g, AstNode *node) {
|
||||
AstNode *proto_node = node->data.fn_def.fn_proto;
|
||||
assert(proto_node->type == NodeTypeFnProto);
|
||||
analyze_node(g, proto_node);
|
||||
|
||||
check_fn_def_control_flow(g, node);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
case NodeTypeFnDecl:
|
||||
@@ -331,7 +392,9 @@ static void analyze_node(CodeGen *g, AstNode *node) {
|
||||
}
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case NodeTypeStatementReturn:
|
||||
analyze_node(g, node->data.statement_return.expression);
|
||||
if (node->data.statement_return.expression) {
|
||||
analyze_node(g, node->data.statement_return.expression);
|
||||
}
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case NodeTypeExpression:
|
||||
switch (node->data.expression.type) {
|
||||
@@ -545,7 +608,7 @@ static LLVMValueRef gen_expr(CodeGen *g, AstNode *expr_node) {
|
||||
zig_unreachable();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void gen_block(CodeGen *g, AstNode *block_node) {
|
||||
static void gen_block(CodeGen *g, AstNode *block_node, bool add_implicit_return) {
|
||||
assert(block_node->type == NodeTypeBlock);
|
||||
|
||||
llvm::DILexicalBlock *di_block = g->dbuilder->createLexicalBlock(g->block_scopes.last(),
|
||||
@@ -558,10 +621,15 @@ static void gen_block(CodeGen *g, AstNode *block_node) {
|
||||
case NodeTypeStatementReturn:
|
||||
{
|
||||
AstNode *expr_node = statement_node->data.statement_return.expression;
|
||||
LLVMValueRef value = gen_expr(g, expr_node);
|
||||
if (expr_node) {
|
||||
LLVMValueRef value = gen_expr(g, expr_node);
|
||||
|
||||
add_debug_source_node(g, statement_node);
|
||||
LLVMBuildRet(g->builder, value);
|
||||
add_debug_source_node(g, statement_node);
|
||||
LLVMBuildRet(g->builder, value);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
add_debug_source_node(g, statement_node);
|
||||
LLVMBuildRetVoid(g->builder);
|
||||
}
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
case NodeTypeExpression:
|
||||
@@ -583,6 +651,10 @@ static void gen_block(CodeGen *g, AstNode *block_node) {
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (add_implicit_return) {
|
||||
LLVMBuildRetVoid(g->builder);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
g->block_scopes.pop();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -685,7 +757,10 @@ void code_gen(CodeGen *g) {
|
||||
LLVMBasicBlockRef entry_block = LLVMAppendBasicBlock(fn, "entry");
|
||||
LLVMPositionBuilderAtEnd(g->builder, entry_block);
|
||||
|
||||
gen_block(g, fn_def_node->data.fn_def.body);
|
||||
CodeGenNode *codegen_node = fn_def_node->codegen_node;
|
||||
assert(codegen_node);
|
||||
bool add_implicit_return = codegen_node->data.fn_def_node.add_implicit_return;
|
||||
gen_block(g, fn_def_node->data.fn_def.body, add_implicit_return);
|
||||
|
||||
g->block_scopes.pop();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user