Files
zig/stage0
Motiejus ea27893b8c sema: add enum_literal→enum coercion and fix ptr_nav child types
- Add enum_literal + enum → enum peer type resolution in
  semaResolvePeerTypes.
- Add enum_literal → enum coercion in semaCoerce: looks up the literal
  name in the target enum type's ZIR to create an enum_tag entry.
- Make comptime CMP_EQ coerce through peer types before comparing,
  matching the Zig compiler's analyzeCmp → resolvePeerTypes → coerce
  path. This creates enum_tag IP entries as side effects.
- Fix ptr_nav child type: use typeOf(val) instead of always type_type.
  During main analysis, all navs get ptr_type(child=typeOf(val)) +
  ptr_nav entries. During preamble, only type declarations
  (struct/enum/union) get ptr_nav. This matches analyzeNavRefInner.
- Remove debug instrumentation (s_dbg_trace_body, instruction traces).
- Add forward declarations for findEnumFieldByName, getEnumFieldIntVal,
  findEnumDeclForNav, internEnumTag.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-02-28 01:35:49 +00:00
..
2026-02-20 12:33:48 +02:00
2026-02-26 00:45:27 +02:00
2026-02-17 10:56:11 +00:00

About

zig0 aspires to be an interpreter of zig 0.15.2 written in C.

Except for the lexer (written by hand by yours truly), it's been written by an LLM.

The goal of stage0 is to be able to implement enough zig to be able to build zig1.wasm. For that we need:

  1. Lexer: DONE, written by hand by yours truly in late 2024.
  2. Parser: DONE, written mostly by an LLM.
  3. AstGen: DONE, written fully by an LLM.
  4. Sema: in progress.

Testing

Quick test:

zig build fmt-zig0 test-zig0

Static analysis (takes a while, run separately):

zig build lint-zig0

More elaborate (tries all compilers + static analysis + ReleaseSafe):

zig build all-zig0 -Doptimize=ReleaseSafe

Most elaborate, takes >10m:

zig build all-zig0 -Doptimize=ReleaseSafe -Dvalgrind |& grep -v Warning

Debugging tips

Test runs infinitely? Build the test program executable:

$ zig build test-zig0 -Dzig0-no-exec

And then run it, capturing the stack trace:

gdb -batch \
    -ex "python import threading; threading.Timer(1.0, lambda: gdb.post_event(lambda: gdb.execute('interrupt'))).start()" \
    -ex run \
    -ex "bt full" \
    -ex quit \
    zig-out/bin/test

You are welcome to replace -ex "bt full" with anything other of interest.

Float Handling

Float literals are parsed with strtold() (C11 standard, portable). On x86-64 Linux, long double is 80-bit extended precision (63 fraction bits).

When a float doesn't round-trip through f64, it's emitted as f128 (ZIR float128 instruction). The 80-bit extended value is converted to IEEE 754 binary128 encoding by bit manipulation — both formats share the same 15-bit exponent with bias 16383. The top 63 of binary128's 112 fraction bits come from the 80-bit value; the bottom 49 are zero-padded.

This means float128 literals lose ~49 bits of precision compared to the upstream Zig implementation (which uses native f128). This is acceptable because stage0 is a bootstrap tool — the real Zig compiler re-parses all source with full f128 precision in later stages. The test comparison mask in astgen_test.zig skips float128 payloads to account for this.

Previous approach used __float128/strtof128 (GCC/glibc extensions) for full precision, but these are not portable to TCC and other C11 compilers.