motiejus/e11sync
1
Fork 0
Code

decentralization

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Motiejus Jakštys 2024-01-25 16:47:17 +02:00
parent 0f9bcba307
commit 55015a0456
1 changed files with 9 additions and 10 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

19
app/signup/templates/signup/index.html
View File

@ -323,26 +323,25 @@
</div> </div>
</article> </article>
{% comment %}
<article> <article>
<input type="checkbox" id="ac-62" checked="checked" /> <input type="checkbox" id="ac-62" checked="checked" />
<label for="ac-62"><h2>Isn’t Syncthing all about decentralization?</h2></label> <label for="ac-62"><h2>Isn’t Syncthing all about decentralization?</h2></label>
<div> <div>
Here is a comment from Syncthing Foundation about 11sync.net: Yes, Syncthing indeed champions decentralization, and we fully embrace
it. At 11sync.net, our role is to complement this decentralized system by
offering a resilient peer that also does back-ups for you (separately
from <a
href="https://docs.syncthing.net/users/versioning.html">versioning</a>).
<blockquote> There is also a feeling that the centralisation of <p>For those who are adept at handling their own backups or already
Syncthing services contradicts the project goals of individuals possess a reliable, always-on peer, 11sync.net might not be necessary.
running decentralised syncing; we (as the project/foundation) will We’re here to provide an additional layer of reliability and convenience
likely not recommend your service as best practice.</blockquote> for those who need it.
<p>We understand and value the position of Syncthing Foundation. Our
goal is to offer a resilient peer to those who need it.
<div></div> <div></div>
</div> </div>
</article> </article>
{% endcomment %}
<article> <article>
<input type="checkbox" id="ac-65" checked="checked" /> <input type="checkbox" id="ac-65" checked="checked" />