3a204583f3
Different Bazel instances can share the zig cache all right. |
||
---|---|---|
.buildkite | ||
bin | ||
ci | ||
rules | ||
test | ||
toolchain | ||
tools | ||
.bazelrc | ||
.bazelversion | ||
.build.yml | ||
.envrc | ||
.gitignore | ||
BUILD | ||
go.mod | ||
go.sum | ||
LICENSE | ||
NOTICE | ||
README.md | ||
release | ||
relnotes.awk | ||
repositories.bzl | ||
tools.go | ||
WORKSPACE |
Bazel zig cc toolchain
This is a C/C++ toolchain that can (cross-)compile C/C++ programs. It contains clang-15, musl, glibc 2-2.34, all in a ~40MB package. Read here about zig-cc; the rest of the README will present how to use this toolchain from Bazel.
Configuring toolchains in Bazel is complex, under-documented, and fraught with peril. I, the co-author of bazel-zig-cc, am still confused on how this all works, and often wonder why it works at all. That aside, we made the our best effort to make bazel-zig-cc usable for your C/C++/CGo projects, with as many guardrails as we could install.
While copy-pasting the code in your project, attempt to read and understand the text surrounding the code snippets. This will save you hours of head scratching, I promise.
Usage
Add this to your WORKSPACE
:
BAZEL_ZIG_CC_VERSION = "v1.0.1"
http_archive(
name = "bazel-zig-cc",
sha256 = "e9f82bfb74b3df5ca0e67f4d4989e7f1f7ce3386c295fd7fda881ab91f83e509",
strip_prefix = "bazel-zig-cc-{}".format(BAZEL_ZIG_CC_VERSION),
urls = ["https://git.sr.ht/~motiejus/bazel-zig-cc/archive/{}.tar.gz".format(BAZEL_ZIG_CC_VERSION)],
)
load("@bazel-zig-cc//toolchain:defs.bzl", zig_toolchains = "toolchains")
# version, url_formats and host_platform_sha256 are optional for those who
# want to control their Zig SDK version.
zig_toolchains(
version = "<...>",
url_formats = [
"https://example.org/zig/zig-{host_platform}-{version}.{_ext}",
],
host_platform_sha256 = { ... },
)
And this to .bazelrc
:
build --incompatible_enable_cc_toolchain_resolution
The snippets above will download the zig toolchain and make the bazel
toolchains available for registration and usage. If you do nothing else, this
may work. The .bazelrc
snippet instructs Bazel to use the registered "new
kinds of toolchains". All above are required regardless of how wants to use it.
The next steps depend on how one wants to use bazel-zig-cc. The descriptions
below is a gentle introduction to C++ toolchains from "user's perspective" too.
Use case: manually build a single target with a specific zig cc toolchain
This option is least disruptive to the workflow compared to no hermetic C++ toolchain, and works best when trying out or getting started with bazel-zig-cc for a subset of targets.
To request Bazel to use a specific toolchain (compatible with the specified platform) for build/tests/whatever on linux-amd64-musl, do:
bazel build \
--platforms @zig_sdk//platform:linux_arm64 \
--extra_toolchains @zig_sdk//toolchain:linux_arm64_musl \
//test/go:go
There are a few things going on here, let's try to dissect them.
Option --platforms @zig_sdk//platform:linux_arm64
Specifies that the our target platform is linux_arm64
, which resolves into:
$ bazel query --output=build @zig_sdk//platform:linux_arm64
platform(
name = "linux_arm64",
generator_name = "linux_arm64",
generator_function = "declare_platforms",
generator_location = "platform/BUILD:7:18",
constraint_values = ["@platforms//os:linux", "@platforms//cpu:aarch64"],
)
constraint_values
instructs Bazel to be looking for a toolchain that is
compatible with (in Bazelspeak, target_compatible_with
) all of the
["@platforms//os:linux", "@platforms//cpu:aarch64"]
.
Option --toolchains=@zig_sdk//toolchain:linux_arm64_musl
Inspect first (@platforms//cpu:aarch64
is an alias to
@platforms//cpu:arm64
):
$ bazel query --output=build @zig_sdk//toolchain:linux_arm64_musl
toolchain(
name = "linux_arm64_musl",
generator_name = "linux_arm64_musl",
generator_function = "declare_toolchains",
generator_location = "toolchain/BUILD:7:19",
toolchain_type = "@bazel_tools//tools/cpp:toolchain_type",
target_compatible_with = ["@platforms//os:linux", "@platforms//cpu:aarch64", "@zig_sdk//libc:unconstrained"],
toolchain = "@zig_sdk//:aarch64-linux-musl_cc",
)
For a platform to pick up the right toolchain, the platform's
constraint_values
must be a subset1 of the toolchain's
target_compatible_with
. Since the platform is a subset (therefore,
toolchain's @zig_sdk//libc:unconstrained
does not matter), this toolchain is
selected for this platform. As a result, --platforms @zig_sdk//platform:linux_amd64
causes Bazel to select a toolchain
@zig_sdk//platform:linux_arm64_musl
(because it satisfies all constraints),
which will compile and link the C/C++ code with musl.
@zig_sdk//libc:unconstrained
will become important later.
Same as above, less typing (with --config
)
Specifying the platform and toolchain for every target may become burdensome,
so they can be put used via --config
. For example, append this to .bazelrc
:
build:linux_arm64 --platforms @zig_sdk//platform:linux_arm64
build:linux_arm64 --extra_toolchains @zig_sdk//toolchain:linux_arm64_musl
And then building to linux-arm64-musl boils down to:
bazel build --config=linux_arm64_musl //test/go:go
Use case: always compile with zig cc
Instead of adding the toolchains to .bazelrc
, they can be added
unconditionally. Append this to WORKSPACE
after zig_toolchains(...)
:
register_toolchains(
"@zig_sdk//toolchain:linux_amd64_gnu.2.19",
"@zig_sdk//toolchain:linux_arm64_gnu.2.28",
"@zig_sdk//toolchain:darwin_amd64",
"@zig_sdk//toolchain:darwin_arm64",
"@zig_sdk//toolchain:windows_amd64",
"@zig_sdk//toolchain:windows_arm64",
)
Append this to .bazelrc
:
build --action_env BAZEL_DO_NOT_DETECT_CPP_TOOLCHAIN=1
From Bazel's perspective, this is almost equivalent to always specifying
--extra_toolchains
on every bazel <...>
command-line invocation. It also
means there is no way to disable the toolchain with the command line. This is
useful if you find bazel-zig-cc useful enough to compile for all of your
targets and tools.
With BAZEL_DO_NOT_DETECT_CPP_TOOLCHAIN=1
Bazel stops detecting the default
host toolchain. Configuring toolchains is complicated enough, and the
auto-detection (read: fallback to non-hermetic toolchain) is a footgun best
avoided. This option is not documented in bazel, so may break. If you intend to
use the hermetic toolchain exclusively, it won't hurt.
Use case: zig-cc for targets for multiple libc variants
When some targets need to be build with different libcs (either different
versions of glibc or musl), use a linux toolchain from
@zig_sdk//libc_aware/toolchains:<...>
. The toolchain will only be selected
when building for a specific libc. For example, in WORKSPACE
:
register_toolchains(
"@zig_sdk//libc_aware/toolchain:linux_amd64_gnu.2.19",
"@zig_sdk//libc_aware/toolchain:linux_arm64_gnu.2.28",
"@zig_sdk//libc_aware/toolchain:x86_64-linux-musl",
)
What does @zig_sdk//libc_aware/toolchain:linux_amd64_gnu.2.19
mean?
$ bazel query --output=build @zig_sdk//libc_aware/toolchain:linux_amd64_gnu.2.19 |& grep target
target_compatible_with = ["@platforms//os:linux", "@platforms//cpu:x86_64", "@zig_sdk//libc:gnu.2.19"],
To see how this relates to the platform:
$ bazel query --output=build @zig_sdk//libc_aware/platform:linux_amd64_gnu.2.19 |& grep constraint
constraint_values = ["@platforms//os:linux", "@platforms//cpu:x86_64", "@zig_sdk//libc:gnu.2.19"],
In this case, the platform's constraint_values
and toolchain's
target_compatible_with
are identical, causing Bazel to select the right
toolchain for the requested platform. With these toolchains registered, one can
build a project for a specific libc-aware platform; it will select the
appropriate toolchain:
$ bazel run --platforms @zig_sdk//libc_aware/platform:linux_amd64_gnu.2.19 //test/c:which_libc
glibc_2.19
$ bazel run --platforms @zig_sdk//libc_aware/platform:linux_amd64_gnu.2.28 //test/c:which_libc
glibc_2.28
$ bazel run --platforms @zig_sdk//libc_aware/platform:linux_amd64_musl //test/c:which_libc
non_glibc
$ bazel run --run_under=file --platforms @zig_sdk//libc_aware/platform:linux_arm64_gnu.2.28 //test/c:which_libc
which_libc: ELF 64-bit LSB executable, ARM aarch64, version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked, interpreter /lib/ld-linux-aarch64.so.1, for GNU/Linux 2.0.0, stripped
To the list of libc aware toolchains and platforms:
$ bazel query @zig_sdk//libc_aware/toolchain/...
$ bazel query @zig_sdk//libc_aware/platform/...
Libc-aware toolchains are especially useful when relying on
transitions, as transitioning extra_platforms
will cause the
host tools to be rebuilt with the specific libc version, which takes time; also
the build host may not be able to run them if, say, target glibc version is
newer than on the host. Some tests in this repository (under test/
) are using
transitions; you may check out how it's done.
The @zig_sdk//libc:variant
constraint is necessary to select a matching
toolchain. Remember: the toolchain's target_compatible_with
must be
equivalent or a superset of the platform's constraint_values
. This is why
both libc-aware platforms and libc-aware toolchains reside in their own
namespace; if we try to mix non-libc-aware to libc-aware, confusion ensues.
To use the libc constraints in the project's platform definitions, add a
@zig_sdk//libc:variant
constraint to them. See the list of available values:
$ bazel query "attr(constraint_setting, @zig_sdk//libc:variant, @zig_sdk//...)"
@zig_sdk//libc:unconstrained
is a special value that indicates that no value
for the constraint is specified. The non libc aware linux toolchains are only
compatible with this value to prevent accidental silent fallthrough to them.
This is a guardrail. Thanks, future me!
Note: Naming
Both Go and Bazel naming schemes are accepted. For convenience with Go, the following Go-style toolchain aliases are created:
Bazel (zig) name | Go name |
---|---|
x86_64 |
amd64 |
aarch64 |
arm64 |
macos |
darwin |
For example, the toolchain linux_amd64_gnu.2.28
is aliased to
x86_64-linux-gnu.2.28
. To find out which toolchains can be registered or
used, run:
$ bazel query @zig_sdk//toolchain/...
Incompatibilities with clang and gcc
zig cc
is almost a drop-in replacement for clang/gcc. This section lists
some of the discovered differences and ways to live with them.
UBSAN and "SIGILL: Illegal Instruction"
zig cc
differs from "mainstream" compilers by enabling UBSAN by
default. Which means your program may compile successfully and crash
with:
SIGILL: illegal instruction
This flag encourages program authors to fix the undefined behavior. There are many ways to find the undefined behavior.
Known Issues In bazel-zig-cc
These are the things you may stumble into when using bazel-zig-cc. I am unlikely to implement them any time soon, but patches implementing those will be accepted. See Questions & Contributions on how to contribute.
Zig cache location
Currently zig cache is in $HOME
, so bazel clean --expunge
does not clear
the zig cache. Zig's cache should be stored somewhere in the project's path.
zig cc concurrency
- Bazel spawns up to
nproc
workers. - For each of those, Go may spawn up to
nproc
processes while compiling. - Zig may do the same.
... causing explosion of heavy compiler processes. This causes CPU to spike. Tracked in ziglang/zig #12101 RFC: -j/--jobs for zig subcommands.
OSX: sysroot
For non-trivial programs (and for all darwin/arm64 cgo programs) MacOS SDK may be necessary. Read Jakub's comment about it. Support for OSX sysroot is currently not implemented.
OSX: different OS targets (Catalina -- Monterey)
Zig 0.9.0 may target macos.10 (Catalina), macos.11 (Big Sur) or macos.12 (Monterey). It currently targets the lowest version, without ability to change it.
Known Issues In Upstream
This section lists issues that I've stumbled into when using zig cc
, and is
outside of bazel-zig-cc's control.
using glibc 2.27 or older
Severity: Medium
Task: ziglang/zig #9485 glibc 2.27 or older: fcntl64 not found, but zig's glibc headers refer it
Background: when glibc 2.27 or older is selected, it may miss fcntl64
. A
workaround is applied for x86_64
, but not for aarch64. The same workaround
may apply to aarch64, but the author didn't find a need to test it (yet).
In September 2022 the severity has been bumped to Medium, because glibc header updates cause a lot of churn when upgrading the SDK, when it shouldn't cause any at all.
Feel free to track Universal headers project for a fix.
Number of libc stubs with Go 1.20+
Until Go 1.19 the number of glibc stubs that needed to be compiled was strictly controlled. Go 1.20 no longer ships with pre-compiled archive files for the standard library, and it generates them on the fly, causing many extraneous libc stubs. Therefore, the initial compilation will take longer until those stubs are pre-cached.
Closed Upstream Issues
- ziglang/zig #12317 Possibility to disable caching for user (CLOSED, thanks andrewrk and motiejus)
- golang/go #52690 Go linker does not put libc onto the linker line (CLOSED, thanks andrewrk and motiejus)
- ziglang/zig #10386 zig cc regression in 0.9.0 (CLOSED, thanks Xavier)
- ziglang/zig #10312 macho: fail if requested -framework is not found (CLOSED, thanks kubkon)
- ziglang/zig #10299 [darwin aarch64 cgo] regression (CLOSED, thanks kubkon)
- ziglang/zig #10297 [darwin x86_64 cgo] regression (CLOSED, thanks kubkon)
- ziglang/zig #9431 FileNotFound when compiling macos (CLOSED, thanks andrewrk)
- ziglang/zig #9139 zig c++ hanging when compiling in parallel (CLOSED, thanks andrewrk)
- ziglang/zig #9050 golang linker segfault (CLOSED, thanks kubkon)
- ziglang/zig #7917 [meta] better c/c++ toolchain compatibility (CLOSED, thanks andrewrk)
- ziglang/zig #7915 ar-compatible command for zig cc (CLOSED, thanks andrewrk)
- ziglang/zig #7667 misplaced relocated glibc stubs (pthread_sigmask) (CLOSED, thanks mjonaitis and andrewrk)
- rules/go #2894 Per-arch_target linker flags (CLOSED, thanks mjonaitis)
- golang/go #46644 cmd/link: with CC=zig: SIGSERV when cross-compiling to darwin/amd64 (CLOSED, thanks kubkon)
... and more.
Host Environments
This repository is used on the following (host) platforms:
linux_amd64
, a.k.a.x86_64
.linux_arm64
, a.k.a.AArch64
.darwin_amd64
, the 64-bit post-PowerPC models.darwin_arm64
, the M1.windows_amd64
, a.k.a.x64
.
The tests are running (CId) on linux-amd64.
Transient docker environment
A standalone Docker environment to play with bazel-zig-cc:
$ docker run -e CC=/usr/bin/false -ti --rm -v "$PWD:/x" -w /x debian:bullseye-slim
# apt update && apt install --no-install-recommends -y shellcheck ca-certificates python3
# ./ci/lint
# ./ci/launcher
# ./ci/test
Communication
We maintain two channels for comms:
- Github issues and pull requests.
- Slack:
#zig
in bazel.slack.com.
Maintainers
This section lists the driving forces behind bazel-zig-cc. Committers have push access, maintainers have their areas. Should make it easier to understand our interests when reading patches or mailing lists.
- Maintainers: Motiejus Jakštys, Laurynas Lubys, Zhongpeng Lin and Sung Yoon Whang.
- Committer for Windows: Fabian Hahn. If you make a change that breaks Windows, Fabian will find you. Please don't break Windows, so Fabian doesn't have to look for you. Instead, send him your patches first.
You may find contact information of the individuals in the commit logs.
Publicity
This section lists notable uses or mentions of bazel-zig-cc.
- 2023-01-24 bazel-zig-cc v1.0.0: releasing bazel-zig-cc and admitting that bazel-zig-cc is used in production to compile all of Uber's Go Monorepo.
- 2022-11-18 BazelCon 2022: Making Uber's hermetic C++ toolchain: Laurynas Lubys presents the story of how this repository came into being and how it was used (as of the conference).
- 2022-05-23 How Zig is used at Uber (youtube): Yours Truly (the author) talks about how bazel-zig-cc came to existence and how it's used at Uber in Milan Zig Meetup.
- 2022-05-23 How Uber uses Zig: text version of the above.
- 2022-03-30 Google Open Source Peer Bonus Program awarded the author $250 for bazel-zig-cc.
- 2022-01-13 bazel-zig-cc building Envoy.
Thanks
Many thanks to Adam Bouhenguel and his bazel-zig-cc, the parent of this repository. Also, the Zig team for making this all possible and handling the issues promptly.
-
a mathematical subset: both can be equal. ↩︎