All instances of this potential bug have been cleaned up in
preceding commits. Increase the severity to ERROR so that it
is easier to detect reoccurences.
Change-Id: I25beebcea1f01f468e0f2b1d24a83511029c077c
Signed-off-by: David Pursehouse <david.pursehouse@gmail.com>
Error Prone reports:
Not calling fail() when expecting an exception masks bugs
See https://errorprone.info/bugpattern/MissingFail
Change-Id: I58ad45a87dcf7d646dce056d20776d62faafbfef
Signed-off-by: David Pursehouse <david.pursehouse@gmail.com>
Error Prone reports:
Not calling fail() when expecting an exception masks bugs
See https://errorprone.info/bugpattern/MissingFail
Change-Id: I518b524de7cd3802f03b80450cad02ab3f79d57b
Signed-off-by: David Pursehouse <david.pursehouse@gmail.com>
Error Prone reports:
Not calling fail() when expecting an exception masks bugs
See https://errorprone.info/bugpattern/MissingFail
Change-Id: Ic89f9daef3c31bfbfd1f3c003cb90a373cd74847
Signed-off-by: David Pursehouse <david.pursehouse@gmail.com>
Error Prone reports:
Not calling fail() when expecting an exception masks bugs
See https://errorprone.info/bugpattern/MissingFail
Change-Id: I463510342bb6e6b99b31a0fe264d953340784393
Signed-off-by: David Pursehouse <david.pursehouse@gmail.com>
The tests were set up to expect an IllegalArgumentException when
the Config.getInt method was called with a section.key that has
not been set, or explicitly set to an empty string.
However, the IllegalArgumentException never gets thrown because
the getInt method returns the provided default ("1"), and because
there was no call to "fail" after getInt, the incorrect behavior
of the test was not noticed.
Remove the try/catch around getInt, and instead assert that the
expected default value is returned.
Found by Error Prone, which reported:
Not calling fail() when expecting an exception masks bugs
See https://errorprone.info/bugpattern/MissingFail
Change-Id: Ie8e692aba9fb8523241fb8f298d57493923d9f78
Signed-off-by: David Pursehouse <david.pursehouse@gmail.com>
Error Prone reports:
Not calling fail() when expecting an exception masks bugs
See https://errorprone.info/bugpattern/MissingFail
Change-Id: I9ac844aa6c5a620d9b5d21d2e242347b3788b96a
Signed-off-by: David Pursehouse <david.pursehouse@gmail.com>
Support the deepen-since parameter when requested by a client using
protocol v2. This is done by:
- adding a DepthWalk.RevWalk#setDeepenSince method
- updating DepthGenerator to recognize when deepen-since is set
- recording in DepthWalk.Commit whether a commit is a boundary commit
Existing users of DepthWalk such as UploadPack previously recognized
boundary commits by comparing their depths against the threshold, not
tracking whether any parents were truly excluded. This behavior is
preserved - UploadPack considers a commit as boundary if its depth is
equal to the threshold *or* a parent was excluded (whether by depth or
by deepen-since).
Change-Id: I852bba6b1279f9cc8aee38282e9339d62b8dcddc
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>
In DepthGenerator, commits are always added to the "pending" queue
either at depth 0 (in the constructor) or after a depth check (in
next()), so it is redundant to check for depth after removing them from
the queue. Remove the check.
This redundancy seems to have been present since the introduction of
server-side shallow clone support in commit 9952223e06 ("Implement
server support for shallow clones", 2011-08-21).
Change-Id: Iad334935293367400c2901a25c0f4bf36c437cf2
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>
The BufferedWriter is opened in a try-with-resource and thus will be
automatically closed.
Presumably the close was added to make sure it is closed before the
subsequent test statements are executed. Instead of explicitly closing
it, let the try-with-resource automatically close it, and move the
subsequent statements out of the try-block.
Change-Id: If5fada2f580ef9cbaad3a0b9216b5200b917781a
Signed-off-by: David Pursehouse <david.pursehouse@gmail.com>
Replace explicit construction of FileWriter with calls to the
utility method Files.newBufferedWriter, which allows to specify
the charset.
Also convert to try-with-resource.
Change-Id: I9fa3f612b9b2fc5ac12cd79d6e61ca181120dbf5
Signed-off-by: David Pursehouse <david.pursehouse@gmail.com>
Replace explicit construction of BufferedReader with calls to the
utility method Files.newBufferedReader, which allows to specify
the charset.
Change-Id: I61b9451dbc8d9cf83fc8a5981292b8fdc713ce37
Signed-off-by: David Pursehouse <david.pursehouse@gmail.com>
As reported by Error Prone:
An inner class should be static unless it references members of its
enclosing class. An inner class that is made non-static unnecessarily
uses more memory and does not make the intent of the class clear.
See https://errorprone.info/bugpattern/ClassCanBeStatic
Change-Id: Ib99d120532630dba63cf400cc1c61c318286fc41
Signed-off-by: David Pursehouse <david.pursehouse@gmail.com>
Incorrect usage of ExpectedException has been cleaned up in the
preceding commits. Increase the severity from WARN to ERROR so
that it is easier to catch any reoccurences.
Change-Id: I57decf620b37e85413bda53723f839c02b488f2c
Signed-off-by: David Pursehouse <david.pursehouse@gmail.com>
The .mailmap file is used to map author and committer names and
email addresses to canonical real names and email addresses.
See https://git-scm.com/docs/git-check-mailmap
Change-Id: I720326ad204bd0737e8ace2620ccbd1347114ef4
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>
It is not obvious why this return statement is needed. Clarify with a
comment that otherwise endless loop may show up when recent versions
of Jetty are used.
Change-Id: I8e5d4de51869fb1179bf599bfb81bcd7d745874b
Signed-off-by: David Ostrovsky <david@ostrovsky.org>
There should only be one statement after the expect(...) method.
Any additional statements after the statement that is expected to
throw will never be executed in a passing test. This can lead to
inappropriately passing tests where later incorrect assertions are
skipped by the thrown exception.
See https://errorprone.info/bugpattern/ExpectedExceptionChecker
Change-Id: I20fecf8fb7a243e9da097e6d03fbf8cd69151bf0
Signed-off-by: David Pursehouse <david.pursehouse@gmail.com>
There should only be one statement after the expect(...) method.
Any additional statements after the statement that is expected to
throw will never be executed in a passing test. This can lead to
inappropriately passing tests where later incorrect assertions are
skipped by the thrown exception.
See https://errorprone.info/bugpattern/ExpectedExceptionChecker
Change-Id: I0d6350fafb281b6bdb04289f4cd5eb4bb159628b
Signed-off-by: David Pursehouse <david.pursehouse@gmail.com>
Support multiple prefixes when querying references to allow
implementor to minimize number of RPC calls.
Change-Id: I5f822fd7eaf9756b44750080d3056de138b64f4a
Signed-off-by: Minh Thai <mthai@google.com>
The commit message template contains a superfluous blank at the end of
the first line, which is deleted by this change. This is only relevant
for jgit contributors using Eclipse, not for jgit users.
Change-Id: I462deb49c26fb64b3dc2d1d75f1e40ef302b0fc9
Signed-off-by: Michael Keppler <Michael.Keppler@gmx.de>
On recent bazel versions it's trivial to apply package specific checks.
Provide custom java toolchain with all error prone warnings activated.
The list of all error prone warnings was borrowed from here: [1].
Test Plan:
$ bazel build --java_toolchain //tools:error_prone_warnings_toolchain \
//...
[1] https://github.com/bazelbuild/BUILD_file_generator/blob/master/tools/bazel_defs/java.bzl
Change-Id: I207a368555bfb7ddab8d782d46d563ce779a6211
Signed-off-by: David Ostrovsky <david@ostrovsky.org>
Signed-off-by: David Pursehouse <david.pursehouse@gmail.com>
This is a base change which prepares for subsequent bugfixes.
Change-Id: Iaadc93df37e45753d700be73669e68c03590adb5
Signed-off-by: Marc Strapetz <marc.strapetz@syntevo.com>
David Pursehouse