stud/MTM/task5-recenzija/task5-recenzija.tex

\documentclass{article}

\usepackage{csquotes}
\usepackage[L7x,T1]{fontenc}
\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
\usepackage[english]{babel}
\usepackage[style=authoryear]{biblatex}
\addbibresource{bib.bib}
\usepackage{hyperref}

\title{
    Research Methodology -- Fifth exercise\\ \vspace{4mm}
    Critical evaluation of scientific work
}

\author{Motiejus Jakštys}

\date{\today}

\begin{document}
\maketitle

\section{Introduction}

This article reviews \cite{186171}, and answers the following questions:

\begin{enumerate}
    \item What kind of study is this? Theoretical, strategic, applied, or experimental?
    \item What is the main purpose of the problem (descriptive, explanatory, correlative, prognostic, prescriptive, or exploratory?
    \item What strategies have been applied? Qualitative, quantitative or mixed?

    \item Do the findings adequately reflect the results?
    \item Has the scientific method been applied properly?
    \item Are the findings based on the research findings described in the text?
    \item Can the study be repeated, is there sufficient information?
    \item Did the study create new knowledge? Is there practical value?
\end{enumerate}

\section{The Paper}

According to \cite{186171}, testing error conditions is critical for robust
distributed systems.

\printbibliography

\end{document}