47 lines
1.3 KiB
TeX
47 lines
1.3 KiB
TeX
\documentclass{article}
|
|
|
|
\usepackage{csquotes}
|
|
\usepackage[L7x,T1]{fontenc}
|
|
\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
|
|
\usepackage[english]{babel}
|
|
\usepackage[style=authoryear]{biblatex}
|
|
\addbibresource{bib.bib}
|
|
\usepackage{hyperref}
|
|
|
|
\title{
|
|
Research Methodology -- Fifth exercise\\ \vspace{4mm}
|
|
Critical evaluation of scientific work
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
\author{Motiejus Jakštys}
|
|
|
|
\date{\today}
|
|
|
|
\begin{document}
|
|
\maketitle
|
|
|
|
\section{Introduction}
|
|
|
|
This article reviews \cite{186171}, and answers the following questions:
|
|
|
|
\begin{enumerate}
|
|
\item What kind of study is this? Theoretical, strategic, applied, or experimental?
|
|
\item What is the main purpose of the problem (descriptive, explanatory, correlative, prognostic, prescriptive, or exploratory?
|
|
\item What strategies have been applied? Qualitative, quantitative or mixed?
|
|
|
|
\item Do the findings adequately reflect the results?
|
|
\item Has the scientific method been applied properly?
|
|
\item Are the findings based on the research findings described in the text?
|
|
\item Can the study be repeated, is there sufficient information?
|
|
\item Did the study create new knowledge? Is there practical value?
|
|
\end{enumerate}
|
|
|
|
\section{The Paper}
|
|
|
|
According to \cite{186171}, testing error conditions is critical for robust
|
|
distributed systems.
|
|
|
|
\printbibliography
|
|
|
|
\end{document}
|