motiejus/stud
1
Fork 0
Code Releases Activity

conclusions and suggested altarnative

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Motiejus Jakštys 2020-05-26 07:42:43 +03:00
parent a12ceeb20e
commit 7bdc4453bb
1 changed files with 14 additions and 1 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

15
II/Referatas/mj-referatas.tex
View File

@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
\newcommand{\DP}{Douglas \& Peucker} \newcommand{\DP}{Douglas \& Peucker}
\newcommand{\VW}{Visvalingam--Whyatt} \newcommand{\VW}{Visvalingam--Whyatt}
\newcommand{\WM}{Wang--M{\"u}ller}
\title{ \title{
Cartografic Generalization of Lines \\ Cartografic Generalization of Lines \\
@ -183,7 +184,14 @@ retained.
\end{figure} \end{figure}
\section{Suggested alternative} \section{Suggested alternative}
\label{sec:my_idea} \label{sec:suggested_alternative}
TODO:
\begin{itemize}
\item Describe algorithm by {\WM}.
\item Explain how outputs will differ.
\item Explain implementation plan?
\end{itemize}
\section{Related Work and future suggestions} \section{Related Work and future suggestions}
\label{sec:related_work} \label{sec:related_work}
@ -201,6 +209,11 @@ between line simplification algorithms could be more objective.
\section{Conclusions and Further Work} \section{Conclusions and Further Work}
\label{sec:conclusions_and_further_work} \label{sec:conclusions_and_further_work}
We have practically evaluated two readily available line simplification
algorithms with a river sample: {\VW} and {\DP}, and outlined their
deficiencies. We are suggesting to implement {\WM} and compare it to the other
two.
\printbibliography \printbibliography
\end{document} \end{document}