commit 8e680d679f924070530301a6844d74d760d6ec8e (tree)
parent d9ef49399b1cbe80778ac7496ff6406d43a67cf2
Author: Motiejus Jakštys <desired.mta@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2019 18:15:14 +0200
finish with the template
Diffstat:
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/MTM/task5-recenzija/task5-recenzija.tex b/MTM/task5-recenzija/task5-recenzija.tex
@@ -1,18 +1,16 @@
\documentclass{article}
+\usepackage{csquotes}
\usepackage[L7x,T1]{fontenc}
\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
-\usepackage[lithuanian]{babel}
-\usepackage{hyperref}
-
+\usepackage[english]{babel}
\usepackage[style=authoryear]{biblatex}
\addbibresource{bib.bib}
-
+\usepackage{hyperref}
\title{
- Mokslinių tyrimų metodologija\\
- Penktoji užduotis\\ \vspace{4mm}
- Mokslo Darbo Kritinis Vertinimas
+ Research Methodology -- Fifth exercise\\ \vspace{4mm}
+ Critical evaluation of scientific work
}
\author{Motiejus Jakštys}
@@ -22,19 +20,23 @@
\begin{document}
\maketitle
+\section{Introduction}
+
+This article reviews \cite{186171}, and answers the following questions:
-\section{Klausimai}
- Kokio tai tipo tyrimas (teorinis, strateginis, taikomas, eksperimentinis)?
- Kokio tipo pagrindinis tyrimo uždavinys (aprašomasis, aiškinamasis, koreliacinis, prognostinis, nurodomasis, žvalgomasis).
- Kokios taikytos tyrimo strategijos (kiekybinės, kokybinės, mišrios)?
+\begin{enumerate}
+ \item What kind of study is this? Theoretical, strategic, applied, or experimental?
+ \item What is the main purpose of the problem (descriptive, explanatory, correlative, prognostic, prescriptive, or exploratory?
+ \item What strategies have been applied? Qualitative, quantitative or mixed?
- Ar pasiekti rezultatai atitinka darbo tikslą ir uždavinius?
- Ar išvados tinkamai atspindi rezultatus?
- Ar tinkamai taikytas mokslinis metodas?
- Ar išvados yra pagrįstos tekste aprašytais tyrimo rezultatais?
- Ar tyrimas gali būti pakartotas, ar tam pakanka informacijos?
- Ar tyrimas sukūrė naujas žinias? Ar yra pademonstruota praktinė vertė?
+ \item Do the findings adequately reflect the results?
+ \item Has the scientific method been applied properly?
+ \item Are the findings based on the research findings described in the text?
+ \item Can the study be repeated, is there sufficient information?
+ \item Did the study create new knowledge? Is there practical value?
+\end{enumerate}
+\section{The Paper}
According to \cite{186171}, testing error conditions is critical for robust
distributed systems.
