stud

commit a12ceeb20eb60c4e966d760620693a5d9404216f (tree)
parent 39bceb09aa26a12987d5925ba8730a8b08c776b9
Author: Motiejus Jakštys <desired.mta@gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 25 May 2020 18:09:44 +0300

suggestions

Diffstat:
M
II/Referatas/mj-referatas.tex
 | 
18
++++++------------

1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/II/Referatas/mj-referatas.tex b/II/Referatas/mj-referatas.tex
@@ -182,20 +182,10 @@ retained.
     \caption{{\DP} and {\VW} side-by-side visual comparison.}
 \end{figure}
 
-\section{Algorithms based on cartographical knowledge}
-
-For further investigation:
-\begin{itemize}
-    \item \cite{jiang2003line}
-    \item \cite{dyken2009simultaneous}
-    \item \cite{mustafa2006dynamic}
-    \item \cite{nollenburg2008morphing}
-\end{itemize}
-
-\section{My Idea}
+\section{Suggested alternative}
 \label{sec:my_idea}
 
-\section{Related Work}
+\section{Related Work and future suggestions}
 \label{sec:related_work}
 
 \cite{stanislawski2012automated} studied different types of metric assessments,
@@ -204,6 +194,10 @@ and tortuosity for the generalization of linear geographic elements. This
 research can provide references to the appropriate settings of the line
 generalization parameters for the maps at various scales.
 
+As noted in item~\ref{itm:2} on page~\pageref{itm:2}, it would be useful to
+have a formula mapping {\DP} tolerance to {\VW}. That way, visual comparisons
+between line simplification algorithms could be more objective.
+
 \section{Conclusions and Further Work}
 \label{sec:conclusions_and_further_work}