wm

Wang–Müller line generalization algorithm in PostGIS
Log | Files | Refs | README | LICENSE

commit 6bc3f74dc9fa09c99d631385f4db94293140f1cf (tree)
parent cd3eaf1798192e8f06132fcfd601d3b46aaa1615
Author: Motiejus Jakštys <motiejus@jakstys.lt>
Date:   Wed, 19 May 2021 22:57:51 +0300

fix figures

Diffstat:
Mmj-msc.tex | 6+++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mj-msc.tex b/mj-msc.tex @@ -1417,7 +1417,7 @@ sharp edges for others. \subsubsection{Large-scale (1:\numprint{250000})} \label{sec:analyzed-large-scale} -As visible in figure~\ref{fig:salvis-wm-250k}, for large-scale map, some of the +As visible in figure~\ref{fig:salvis-wm-250k-10x}, for large-scale map, some of the resulting bends look significantly exaggerated. Why is that? Figure~\ref{fig:salvis-wm-250k-overlaid-zoom} zooms in the large-scale simplification and overlays the original. @@ -1432,11 +1432,11 @@ simplification and overlays the original. \hfill \begin{subfigure}[b]{.49\textwidth} \centering - \includegraphics[width=.2\textwidth]{salvis-wm-250k} + \includegraphics[width=.2\textwidth]{salvis-wm-250k-10x} \caption{Simplified.} \end{subfigure} \caption{GDB10LT simplified with {\WM} for 1:\numprint{250000}.} - \label{fig:salvis-wm-250k} + \label{fig:salvis-wm-250k-10x} \end{figure} \begin{figure}[ht]