Fix resolvepeertype() int signess and feedback improvements

This commit is contained in:
Luuk de Gram
2020-07-24 17:51:24 +02:00
parent 470264a4f5
commit 3019ab9391

View File

@@ -3087,7 +3087,7 @@ fn analyzeInstArithmetic(self: *Module, scope: *Scope, inst: *zir.Inst.BinOp) In
if (casted_lhs.value()) |lhs_val| {
if (casted_rhs.value()) |rhs_val| {
return self.analyzeInstScalar(scope, scalar_type, inst, lhs_val, rhs_val);
return self.analyzeInstComptimeOp(scope, scalar_type, inst, lhs_val, rhs_val);
}
}
@@ -3102,7 +3102,7 @@ fn analyzeInstArithmetic(self: *Module, scope: *Scope, inst: *zir.Inst.BinOp) In
}
/// Analyzes operands that are known at comptime
fn analyzeInstScalar(self: *Module, scope: *Scope, res_type: Type, inst: *zir.Inst.BinOp, lhs_val: Value, rhs_val: Value) InnerError!*Inst {
fn analyzeInstComptimeOp(self: *Module, scope: *Scope, res_type: Type, inst: *zir.Inst.BinOp, lhs_val: Value, rhs_val: Value) InnerError!*Inst {
// incase rhs is 0, simply return lhs without doing any calculations
// TODO Once division is implemented we should throw an error when dividing by 0.
if (rhs_val.tag() == .zero or rhs_val.tag() == .the_one_possible_value) {
@@ -3116,16 +3116,16 @@ fn analyzeInstScalar(self: *Module, scope: *Scope, res_type: Type, inst: *zir.In
const value = try switch (inst.base.tag) {
.add => blk: {
const val = if (is_int)
bigIntAdd(scope.arena(), lhs_val, rhs_val)
intAdd(scope.arena(), lhs_val, rhs_val)
else
floatAdd(self.target(), scope.arena(), res_type, lhs_val, rhs_val);
self.floatAdd(scope, res_type, inst, lhs_val, rhs_val);
break :blk val;
},
.sub => blk: {
const val = if (is_int)
bigIntSub(scope.arena(), lhs_val, rhs_val)
intSub(scope.arena(), lhs_val, rhs_val)
else
floatSub(self.target(), scope.arena(), res_type, lhs_val, rhs_val);
self.floatSub(scope, res_type, inst, lhs_val, rhs_val);
break :blk val;
},
else => return self.fail(scope, inst.base.src, "TODO Implement arithmetic operand '{}'", .{@tagName(inst.base.tag)}),
@@ -3556,7 +3556,10 @@ fn resolvePeerTypes(self: *Module, scope: *Scope, instructions: []*Inst) !Type {
prev_inst = next_inst;
continue;
}
if (prev_inst.ty.isInt() and next_inst.ty.isInt()) {
if (prev_inst.ty.isInt() and
next_inst.ty.isInt() and
prev_inst.ty.isSignedInt() == next_inst.ty.isSignedInt())
{
if (prev_inst.ty.intInfo(self.target()).bits < next_inst.ty.intInfo(self.target()).bits) {
prev_inst = next_inst;
}
@@ -3819,7 +3822,7 @@ fn srcHashEql(a: std.zig.SrcHash, b: std.zig.SrcHash) bool {
return @bitCast(u128, a) == @bitCast(u128, b);
}
fn bigIntAdd(allocator: *Allocator, lhs: Value, rhs: Value) !Value {
fn intAdd(allocator: *Allocator, lhs: Value, rhs: Value) !Value {
// TODO is this a performance issue? maybe we should try the operation without
// resorting to BigInt first.
var lhs_space: Value.BigIntSpace = undefined;
@@ -3847,7 +3850,7 @@ fn bigIntAdd(allocator: *Allocator, lhs: Value, rhs: Value) !Value {
return Value.initPayload(val_payload);
}
fn bigIntSub(allocator: *Allocator, lhs: Value, rhs: Value) !Value {
fn intSub(allocator: *Allocator, lhs: Value, rhs: Value) !Value {
// TODO is this a performance issue? maybe we should try the operation without
// resorting to BigInt first.
var lhs_space: Value.BigIntSpace = undefined;
@@ -3875,15 +3878,16 @@ fn bigIntSub(allocator: *Allocator, lhs: Value, rhs: Value) !Value {
return Value.initPayload(val_payload);
}
fn floatAdd(cur_target: Target, allocator: *Allocator, float_type: Type, lhs: Value, rhs: Value) !Value {
fn floatAdd(self: *Module, scope: *Scope, float_type: Type, inst: *zir.Inst.BinOp, lhs: Value, rhs: Value) !Value {
var bit_count = switch (float_type.tag()) {
.comptime_float => 128,
else => float_type.floatBits(cur_target),
else => float_type.floatBits(self.target()),
};
const allocator = scope.arena();
const val_payload = switch (bit_count) {
16 => {
@panic("TODO soft float");
return self.fail(scope, inst.base.src, "TODO Implement addition for soft floats", .{});
},
32 => blk: {
const lhs_val = lhs.toFloat(f32);
@@ -3900,7 +3904,7 @@ fn floatAdd(cur_target: Target, allocator: *Allocator, float_type: Type, lhs: Va
break :blk &val_payload.base;
},
128 => blk: {
@panic("TODO Big float");
return self.fail(scope, inst.base.src, "TODO Implement addition for big floats", .{});
},
else => unreachable,
};
@@ -3908,15 +3912,16 @@ fn floatAdd(cur_target: Target, allocator: *Allocator, float_type: Type, lhs: Va
return Value.initPayload(val_payload);
}
fn floatSub(cur_target: Target, allocator: *Allocator, float_type: Type, lhs: Value, rhs: Value) !Value {
fn floatSub(self: *Module, scope: *Scope, float_type: Type, inst: *zir.Inst.BinOp, lhs: Value, rhs: Value) !Value {
var bit_count = switch (float_type.tag()) {
.comptime_float => 128,
else => float_type.floatBits(cur_target),
else => float_type.floatBits(self.target()),
};
const allocator = scope.arena();
const val_payload = switch (bit_count) {
16 => {
@panic("TODO soft float");
return self.fail(scope, inst.base.src, "TODO Implement substraction for soft floats", .{});
},
32 => blk: {
const lhs_val = lhs.toFloat(f32);
@@ -3933,7 +3938,7 @@ fn floatSub(cur_target: Target, allocator: *Allocator, float_type: Type, lhs: Va
break :blk &val_payload.base;
},
128 => blk: {
@panic("TODO Big float");
return self.fail(scope, inst.base.src, "TODO Implement substraction for big floats", .{});
},
else => unreachable,
};