stud

commit 7bdc4453bb644113c74a89ad3945101200139b82 (tree)
parent a12ceeb20eb60c4e966d760620693a5d9404216f
Author: Motiejus Jakštys <desired.mta@gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 26 May 2020 07:42:43 +0300

conclusions and suggested altarnative

Diffstat:
M
II/Referatas/mj-referatas.tex
 | 
15
++++++++++++++-

1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/II/Referatas/mj-referatas.tex b/II/Referatas/mj-referatas.tex
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
 
 \newcommand{\DP}{Douglas \& Peucker}
 \newcommand{\VW}{Visvalingam--Whyatt}
+\newcommand{\WM}{Wang--M{\"u}ller}
 
 \title{
     Cartografic Generalization of Lines \\
@@ -183,7 +184,14 @@ retained.
 \end{figure}
 
 \section{Suggested alternative}
-\label{sec:my_idea}
+\label{sec:suggested_alternative}
+
+TODO:
+\begin{itemize}
+    \item Describe algorithm by {\WM}.
+    \item Explain how outputs will differ.
+    \item Explain implementation plan?
+\end{itemize}
 
 \section{Related Work and future suggestions}
 \label{sec:related_work}
@@ -201,6 +209,11 @@ between line simplification algorithms could be more objective.
 \section{Conclusions and Further Work}
 \label{sec:conclusions_and_further_work}
 
+We have practically evaluated two readily available line simplification
+algorithms with a river sample: {\VW} and {\DP}, and outlined their
+deficiencies. We are suggesting to implement {\WM} and compare it to the other
+two.
+
 \printbibliography
 
 \end{document}